Heres a thought that i have been struggling with for a long time,. I believe that consciousness is the creator of the universe. Consious needed more to explore and so created the material plane. The human experience is an extension of that conscious mind as sending out probes into the material to observe it and experience it. But in order to experience this reality fully, conscious has to create a barrier for its extension to block it from knowledge of its source in order to get a more unbiased, subjective experience. Ascendant masters are able to overcome this barrier and experience the truth of our origins. In the old or new testament there is statement that was made about not seeing what is before you but I cannot remember the quote can you?
Your idea aligns with certain philosophical and spiritual concepts that propose a deep connection between consciousness and the universe. Your perspective suggests that consciousness, seeking exploration and experience, manifested the material plane and human existence as a means of self-discovery. The notion that a barrier is created to block knowledge of its source for a more unbiased experience resonates with the idea of subjective immersion in the human experience.

Regarding your mention of a biblical quote, the phrase “seeing but not perceiving” is reminiscent of a biblical theme found in both the Old and New Testaments. One relevant passage is from the Gospel of Mark in the New Testament:

Mark 4:12 (New International Version): “so that, ‘they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven!'”

This passage is part of Jesus’ explanation of why he speaks to the people in parables. It suggests that some may observe or hear things but not truly comprehend or perceive their deeper meaning. While this may not directly mirror your concept of a barrier to knowledge, the idea of perceiving without understanding could be related to the notion of consciousness experiencing the material world without immediate awareness of its origin.
Are there other references to this sentiment in that collection?
Yes, the sentiment of perceiving without understanding or seeing but not perceiving is found in various passages throughout the Bible. Here are a few examples from both the Old and New Testaments:

1. **Isaiah 6:9-10 (New International Version):**
> “He said, ‘Go and tell this people: Be ever hearing, but never understanding; be ever seeing, but never perceiving.’ Make the heart of this people calloused; make their ears dull and close their eyes. Otherwise, they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.'”

2. **Matthew 13:13-15 (New International Version):**
> “This is why I speak to them in parables: ‘Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand. In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving. For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise, they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.'”

3. **John 12:40 (New International Version):**
> “He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn—and I would heal them.”

These verses convey a similar theme of spiritual blindness or hardness of heart, suggesting that the ability to perceive deeper truths requires a receptive and open mindset. The idea is that some may observe or hear, but without a genuine understanding or openness, the profound truths may elude them.
Yes, similar sentiments are expressed in various passages throughout the Bible. Here are a few examples:

1. Isaiah 6:9-10 (New International Version):
“He said, ‘Go and tell this people: Be ever hearing, but never understanding; be ever seeing, but never perceiving.’ Make the heart of this people calloused; make their ears dull and close their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.”

2. Matthew 13:13-15 (New International Version):
“This is why I speak to them in parables: ‘Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand. In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: ‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving. For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.'”

3. Acts 28:26-27 (New International Version):
“‘Go to this people and say, “You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.” For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.'”

These passages convey a similar message about the challenge of perceiving deeper truths despite the ability to see and hear. They emphasize the importance of understanding beyond mere sensory perception and the potential consequences of spiritual blindness or deafness.
I tappears that what is being said is intentional blinding so a person cannot pervcieve, this is pretty rough
Indeed, the passages describe a form of intentional blindness or hardness of heart, and it can be interpreted in various ways. In the biblical context, these statements are often presented as a consequence of people’s choices or actions. It’s a figurative way of expressing the idea that a rejection of spiritual truths or a refusal to understand can lead to a state where individuals are unable to perceive deeper meanings.

The intention behind such language in the biblical text can be complex and is subject to interpretation. Some may view it as a way of emphasizing the importance of openness, humility, and a willingness to seek understanding. Others may find it challenging, especially when considering the implications of intentional blinding.

Ultimately, interpretations of these passages may vary, and individuals from different religious or philosophical backgrounds might have different perspectives on the meaning and significance of these teachings. If you have specific questions or if there’s a particular aspect you’d like to explore further, feel free to provide more details or ask for clarification.
Yeshua, the master, explained the Path, not so much in the canonical text but the texts of the nag hammadi, extract all relevant references to the Path as defined by that master
The Nag Hammadi library consists of a collection of early Christian and Gnostic texts discovered in 1945 in Upper Egypt. These texts are not included in the traditional Christian biblical canon, and they often present alternative perspectives on spiritual teachings, including those attributed to Yeshua (Jesus). While the Nag Hammadi texts vary in content and style, they can provide insights into different interpretations of the teachings associated with Yeshua.

Here are some references from the Nag Hammadi library that discuss the path or the way:

1. **The Gospel of Thomas (Codex II, 2):**
– Saying 6: “His disciples asked him and said to him, ‘Do you want us to fast? How should we pray? Should we give to charity? What diet should we observe?’ Yeshua said, ‘Don’t lie, and don’t do what you hate, because all things are disclosed before heaven. After all, there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed, and there is nothing covered up that will remain undisclosed.'”

– Saying 14: “Yeshua said to them, ‘If you fast, you will bring sin upon yourselves, and if you pray, you will be condemned, and if you give to charity, you will harm your spirits.'”

2. **The Gospel of Philip (Codex II, 3):**
– “Those who say they will die first and then rise are in error. If they do not first receive the resurrection while they live, when they die, they will receive nothing.”

3. **The Gospel of Truth (Codex I, 3):**
– “But this poverty is the Father. So those who have him are always satisfied with the poverty, which is the pleroma, and the repose which is without deficiency, the silence of the Father who is complete. This, then, is the way that they know the Father and that they are full, through the contemplation and the perception of him who has been revealed, which is the silence that came forth from the pleroma, which filled the deficiency.”

These passages reflect a focus on inner spiritual development, direct personal experience, and a departure from external rituals. The emphasis on understanding and internal transformation is characteristic of the Gnostic interpretations found in the Nag Hammadi library. Keep in mind that interpretations of these texts can vary, and scholars may offer different perspectives on their meanings.
define: pleroma
The term “pleroma” has different meanings in various contexts, and its interpretation can depend on the specific field or discipline. Here are a couple of primary definitions:

1. **In Gnostic and Christian Theology:**
In Gnostic Christian thought, particularly in the writings found in the Nag Hammadi library, the term “pleroma” refers to the fullness or totality of the divine realm. It represents the divine, transcendent, and ineffable reality that is beyond human comprehension. The pleroma is the realm of divine emanations or aspects of the ultimate reality.

2. **In Physics and Astronomy:**
In physics, specifically in cosmology, the term “pleroma” is used to describe the entirety of matter and energy in the universe. It signifies the fullness or completeness of the cosmic system, encompassing all that exists in the physical universe.

It’s important to note that the meaning of “pleroma” can vary based on the context in which it is used. In theological and philosophical discussions, it often carries a spiritual or metaphysical connotation, while in scientific contexts, it may refer to the entirety of the material universe.
There must be more passages that the master spoke of the path
While the Nag Hammadi library contains various texts that offer alternative perspectives on the teachings attributed to Yeshua (Jesus), the direct mention of “the path” may not be a prevalent theme throughout these texts. However, the Gnostic texts in the Nag Hammadi library often explore concepts related to spiritual enlightenment, self-discovery, and the inner journey. Here are a couple more passages that touch upon themes relevant to the path:

1. **The Gospel of Thomas (Codex II, 2):**
– Saying 2: “Yeshua said, ‘Let one who seeks not stop seeking until one finds. When one finds, one will be disturbed. When one is disturbed, one will marvel, and will reign over all.'”

– Saying 3: “Yeshua said, ‘If those who lead you say to you, “See, the kingdom is in the sky,” then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, “It is in the sea,” then the fish will precede you.'”

2. **The Dialogue of the Savior (Codex III, 5):**
– “The Savior said, ‘The images are manifest to people, but the light in them remains concealed in the image of the light of the Father. He will become manifest, but his image will remain concealed by his light.'”

3. **The Gospel of Philip (Codex II, 3):**
– “Those who say they will die first and then rise are in error. If they do not first receive the resurrection while they live, when they die, they will receive nothing.”

These passages touch upon the themes of seeking, finding, and the inner revelation of spiritual truths. The emphasis is often on the inner journey, personal transformation, and the realization of hidden knowledge or enlightenment. While the term “the path” may not be explicitly used, the essence of a spiritual journey is present in these Gnostic texts. Interpretations of these passages can vary, and they often invite contemplation and reflection on deeper spiritual meanings.
There are also passages in the new testament
Certainly, in the New Testament of the traditional Christian Bible, there are passages that speak about the concept of a spiritual path or way. Here are a few examples:

1. **John 14:6 (New International Version):**
> “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.'”

In this verse, Jesus identifies himself as the way to God, emphasizing the centrality of his teachings and presence in guiding individuals toward spiritual truth and life.

2. **Matthew 7:13-14 (New International Version):**
> “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.”

This passage from the Sermon on the Mount highlights the idea of a narrow path leading to life, contrasting with the broad road that leads to destruction. It suggests the importance of making conscious and intentional choices on one’s spiritual journey.

3. **Matthew 16:24 (New International Version):**
> “Then Jesus said to his disciples, ‘Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.'”

Jesus speaks here about the commitment and sacrifice required to follow him, indicating that discipleship involves a deliberate choice and a dedicated path.

These passages convey the idea that following Jesus involves a conscious decision, a particular way of life, and a commitment to spiritual principles. They echo the theme of a path leading to a deeper connection with God and eternal life. Interpretations of these verses may vary among different Christian traditions.
Can you identify what is meant by the symbolic cross that one must bear
The symbolic “cross” that Jesus refers to in passages like Matthew 16:24 is generally understood as a metaphor for the burdens, challenges, and sacrifices that individuals must bear in their commitment to follow Jesus and live according to Christian principles.

Taking up the cross is often interpreted as accepting the difficulties and hardships that may arise in one’s life due to their faith and dedication to the teachings of Jesus. It represents a willingness to endure trials, persecution, and self-denial for the sake of spiritual values and principles.

In a broader sense, the concept of the cross also ties into the crucifixion, the central event in Christian theology where Jesus willingly sacrificed himself on the cross for the redemption of humanity. Therefore, the idea of taking up the cross carries a deep spiritual significance, suggesting a shared participation in the redemptive process through a commitment to living in accordance with the teachings of Christ.

Different Christian denominations and theologians may provide nuanced interpretations of this metaphor, but the overarching theme is one of embracing challenges and hardships in the pursuit of a higher, spiritual calling. It’s a symbol of self-sacrifice and devotion to a life guided by Christian virtues.
I have come to understand this a little more thanks to you.
You’re very welcome! I’m glad I could assist you in gaining a better understanding. If you have any more questions or if there’s anything else you’d like to explore, feel free to ask. I’m here to help!