What is the sentiment of this paragraph? : Why aren’t people acting the way they claim they want the world to be? We sit on wealth and hoarded goods and piously complain? But there is no profit in smart relations and curious respect for others cultures. Conflict in today’s age of technology and information sharing should be outdated, yet even that is weaponized by agitators many of whom don’t even belong in the group for whom they claim to speak. Professional entities who profit from war and deflect attention through civil unrest. The CIA once said and I paraphrase, “once the public doesn’t know who to trust, then we have done our job” (I am quoting from memory so I may be off a lot). Are we ever going to brave enough to publicly identify those interests that are threatening our way of living? Must we be obedient to the whim of government that caters to larger foreign interests that wish to decide our fate? Like it or not, while the current trend is to wean off fossil fuels, there are powerful countries that are eyeing our coal and oil fields. ‘Nuff said .
The sentiment of this paragraph is predominantly negative. The author expresses frustration, disillusionment, and skepticism towards people’s behavior and their lack of alignment with their stated desires for the world. They criticize the accumulation of wealth and material possessions, along with the hypocrisy of complaining about societal issues while not actively promoting positive relationships and respecting other cultures. The author also highlights the weaponization of technology and information, the manipulation of public trust by certain entities, and the potential threats posed by powerful countries eyeing their natural resources. Overall, the tone conveys a sense of dissatisfaction and concern about the current state of affairs.
Can any of the arguments be strengthened?
Certainly! Here are a few ways some of the arguments in the paragraph could be strengthened:

1. The hypocrisy of people’s behavior: To strengthen this argument, you could provide specific examples or statistics that highlight the contrast between what people claim to want for the world and how they actually act. This could involve referencing surveys or studies that demonstrate the gap between stated values and actions.

2. The weaponization of technology and information: To strengthen this argument, you could provide specific instances or examples where technology and information have been intentionally misused to incite conflict or manipulate public opinion. This could involve citing well-documented cases or referring to reputable sources that showcase the negative impact of these actions.

3. Manipulation of public trust by entities profiting from war: To strengthen this argument, you could provide evidence or examples of how certain entities have benefited financially from promoting or perpetuating wars or conflicts. This could involve referencing investigations, reports, or historical examples that demonstrate a clear link between profit motives and the perpetuation of war.

4. Threats to national interests and sovereignty: To strengthen this argument, you could provide more information about the specific countries eyeing the coal and oil fields and their historical track record with regard to resource exploitation. Additionally, you could present evidence of their intentions or actions that demonstrate a clear threat to the nation’s interests and sovereignty.

By including additional evidence, examples, or concrete data, these arguments can be further reinforced and made more compelling.
As the paragraph stands, it does convey a complete cohesive thought?
Yes, the paragraph as it stands conveys a complete and cohesive thought. It expresses the author’s frustration with the disconnect between people’s professed desires for a better world and their actual behaviors. It discusses the accumulation of wealth, the lack of value placed on respectful relationships and cultural understanding, the weaponization of technology and information, manipulation by certain entities, public distrust, the influence of foreign interests on government decisions, and the potential threat to national resources. While the paragraph could be expanded upon or further developed, it does present a coherent viewpoint on these issues.
Assess this for sentiment and grammar pleaseI can fill a few shoes. Mainly I am am a computer geek with excellent knowledge of computer systems. Not so much Mac and some technologies I need to review again like remote server management and the like. I am currently working on a personal project to build an all knowing AI that is local unless it needs data from the ‘net. I have excellent phone skills and speak better than I write (I worked radio in college). I have done sales but can only do so now with a product that is 100% legitimate. Inbound sales I am fine with with. I am currently working with a company that most people are annoyed with and that is political ‘surveys’. As I moved out to the sticks my only options are online. Thanks for listening.
Sentiment: The sentiment of this paragraph is generally neutral. The author provides information about their skills, experiences, and current projects without expressing strong positive or negative emotions.

Grammar: Overall, the paragraph is grammatically correct. However, there are a few minor improvements that can be made for clarity and readability:

1. “I am am” should be corrected to “I am.”
2. “Not so much Mac” can be rephrased as “I’m not as proficient with Mac.”
3. “Remote server management and the like” can be clarified as “remote server management and similar technologies.”
4. “An all-knowing AI” can be changed to “an all-knowing AI system” for better clarity.
5. “Speak better than I write” can be rephrased as “I am more fluent in speaking than in writing.”
6. “I have done sales but can only do so now” can be revised as “I have previous experience in sales, but currently, I am only able to engage in sales for 100% legitimate products.”
7. “Inbound sales I am fine with with” can be rewritten as “I am comfortable with inbound sales.”

With these minor adjustments, the paragraph can be improved for better grammar and clarity. Revised version:

“I can fill a few roles. Mainly, I am a computer geek with excellent knowledge of computer systems. I’m not as proficient with Mac, and I may need to review certain technologies like remote server management. Currently, I am working on a personal project to build an all-knowing AI system that operates locally unless it requires internet data. I have excellent phone skills, and my verbal communication is stronger than my writing skills (I worked in radio during college). I have previous sales experience, but now I can only engage in sales for products that are 100% legitimate. I am comfortable with inbound sales. Currently, I am working with a company involved in political surveys, which can be annoying for many people. As I moved to a more remote area, online options are my only choice. Thank you for listening.”
what is the sentiment here: To suggest part of answer to academic debt is that our government will subsidize through guaranteed loans a person’s education. Knowing this our Universities have increased tuition so much because they know they will get paid whatever they charge.
The sentiment expressed in this statement is negative. The author suggests that one possible solution to address academic debt is for the government to subsidize education through guaranteed loans. However, they criticize universities for taking advantage of this system by increasing tuition fees excessively, knowing that they will receive payment regardless of the amount they charge. This implies a sense of frustration or disapproval towards the behavior of universities, indicating a negative sentiment towards the situation.
What I want to convey is that the government, by subsidizing loans, is responsible for the high tuition costs due to the fact the universities are guaranteed payment for whatever they choose to charge
Apologies for the previous misunderstanding. In that case, the sentiment expressed in your statement is also negative. The author contends that the government’s practice of subsidizing loans has resulted in increased tuition costs at universities. The author places the responsibility for the high tuition fees on the government’s policy, suggesting that universities can charge whatever they want because they are guaranteed payment through these loans. This conveys a critical viewpoint and a sense of dissatisfaction with the government’s role in contributing to the high cost of education.
Please rewrite my original to convey this concisely in as few words as possible
Government-subsidized loans have led universities to raise tuition, knowing they will receive payment regardless of the amount charged.
a bit more expansive
The government’s practice of subsidizing loans has created a situation where universities can increase tuition fees significantly, confident that they will still receive payment regardless of the exorbitant charges.