review some of my ramblings and provide a concise request to post to a team of researchers to evaluate the theories – My modified field torsion theory. Please

Sure. Please share a few of your “ramblings” or notes related to your **Modified Field Torsion Theory**, and I’ll distill them into a clean, concise, and professional research request suitable for sharing with a team of physicists or interdisciplinary researchers.

To keep it sharp and compelling, I’ll aim for:
– A brief abstract-style summary of your core ideas.
– The specific question(s) or critique you’re seeking.
– A call to action (e.g., theoretical validation, simulation suggestions, etc.).

Ready when you are—drop the first few entries you’d like me to refine.
Review our conversations please
Based on your shared context and ongoing themes from past conversations, here’s a distilled and polished request you can send to a research team to evaluate your **Modified Field Torsion Theory**:

—

**Subject:** Request for Peer Evaluation – Modified Field Torsion Theory Proposal

**Dear [Team/Colleagues/Research Group],**

I am developing a theory I call **Modified Field Torsion Theory**, an alternative approach to gravity and field dynamics that diverges from traditional curvature-based general relativity. The core proposition is that **torsion, not curvature**, is the primary geometric feature responsible for gravitational effects—aligning loosely with Teleparallel Gravity but with key modifications grounded in field symmetry and light-matter interactions.

**Core Assumptions and Proposals:**
– Gravity is not a curvature of spacetime but a result of **torsional field lines**—fields twisting in response to energy distributions.
– The pre-Big Bang universe was a **symmetrical field state**, undisturbed and uniform, until a singular perturbation broke symmetry.
– Light is **not merely EM radiation**, but a distinct, foundational entity embedded within the EM spectrum—possibly the initiating agent of symmetry breaking.
– The illusion of “dark matter” is a misinterpretation of field torsion effects in galactic structures.
– “Dark energy” is an artifact of misunderstood large-scale field dynamics, not a separate force or substance.

**What I’m Seeking:**
– A critical peer review of the core theoretical framework.
– Input on mathematical formalisms that could express torsion as a field-driven phenomenon (especially in non-curvature frameworks).
– Suggestions on how to simulate or visualize torsional field effects in a high-fidelity environment (e.g., Unreal Engine or other spatial physics platforms).
– Discussion of compatibility or conflict with existing gravitational lensing data and cosmological expansion observations.

**Tone Disclaimer:** My approach questions some sacred cows (like dark matter/energy), but I welcome constructive rebuttals, rigorous counterpoints, and any path that clarifies or falsifies the model.

Thank you for your time and expertise. I’m looking forward to your thoughts.

Warm regards,
**Dr. Tripper**
_Modified Field Theory Researcher & Simulation Architect_

—

Would you like me to tailor this further for a formal paper preface, a Reddit AskScience post, or something more like a collaboration proposal to a university group?