The following code is from a file called the_compiler.py. We are going to step through it and explain it all. Identify areas that can be modified to accept user input. Wrap it in a streamlit interface. :”#autonmous agent load balancing add more agents to spec interpreter, add more agents to spec generate or unit tester, default is 3 1 for each, use your own llms, starcoder, reinforcement backed individual agent learning, particle swarm tree of thoughts -> run tree of thoughts on the space of all thoughts ran by agents as trees of an networked swarm system, use autogpt config and env with embedding retriveal search, map all thoughts to an embedding database, while now tester is not done keep running in a while loop, agentgpt with autoforestgpt, program optimizer agent works in unison with the generator to optimize code. Create 5 optimizations for this code: {code}, for generator ask generator to ask questions about spec and unit test and then answer those questions by transforming it into algoritmic pseudoce then code with the logic, also add spawns where boss node spawns new agents for each task, https://github.com/Araq/malebolgia, have agent select programming langauges and infrastcuture to pass into the unit tester and generator, prompt, each agent stops when the tree has found an optimal solution
#inital implementation of the compiler
import subprocess
import json
import re
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
import os
import re
import time
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
class AbstractLanguageModel(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
pass
@abstractmethod
def evaluate_states(self, states):
pass
class CustomLanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
#implement the thought generation logic using self.model
pass
def evaluate_states(self, states):
#implement state evaluation logic using self.model
pass
class OpenAILanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”):
openai.api_key = api_key
self.strategy = strategy
self.evaluation_strategy = evaluation_strategy
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, generate {k} coherent thoughts to continue the reasoning process:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=k,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
thoughts = [choice.text.strip() for choice in response.choices]
print(thoughts)
return thoughts
def evaluate_states(self, states):
if self.evaluation_strategy == ‘value’:
state_values = {}
for state in states:
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=10,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
try:
# print(response.choices[0].text.strip())
value = float(response.choices[0].text.strip())
print(value)
except ValueError:
value = 0 # Assign a default value if the conversion fails
state_values[state] = value
return state_values
elif self.evaluation_strategy == ‘vote’:
states_text = ‘n’.join([‘ ‘.join(state) for state in states])
prompt = f”Given the following states of reasoning, vote for the best state:n{states_text}nnVote:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
best_state_text = response.choices[0].text.strip()
print(best_state_text)
best_state = tuple(best_state_text.split())
return {state: 1 if state == best_state else 0 for state in states}
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid evaluation strategy. Choose ‘value’ or ‘vote’.”)
class OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(OpenAILanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”, cache_enabled=True):
super().__init__(api_key, strategy, evaluation_strategy)
self.cache_enabled = cache_enabled
self.thought_cache = {}
self.state_evaluation_cache = {}
def parallel_generate_thoughts(self, states, k):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
thoughts = list(executor.map(lambda state: self.generate_thoughts(state, k), states))
print(thoughts)
return thoughts
def parallel_evaluate_states(self, states):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
state_values = list(executor.map(self.evaluate_states, states))
print(state_values)
return state_values
# model = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(‘your_openai_api_key_here’)
#update tree of thoughts to use optimized models mehtods
class TreeofThoughts:
“””
1. Thought Decomposition –> based on problem properties
2. Thought Generator -> create a thought generator function G(p0, s, k) with 2 strategies a sample iid thoughts from a cot prompt b. propose thoughts
sequentially using a propose prompt
3. create a state evaluator function V(p0, S) with 2 strategies a value each state independently b. vote across states
4. Choose a search algo based on tree structure [BFS or DFS]
Implement chosen search algorithm for bfs (algo1):
init S0 with the input x
for t = 1 to T (step limit):
generate candidate thoughts for each state in St-1
eveluate the candiate states using the state evaluator V
select the b most promising states for St
return the final output by genertaing the thought for the best state in St for DFS(algo2)
defien a recurseive DFS function with the current state s, step t, and other required params
if t > T record the output by generating the thought for current state S
for each candidate state s in the sorted list of generated thoughts for s:
if the evaluated value of s is greater the the threshold of vth call the dfs function recursively
with s and t + 1
execute the chosen search algo with the input problem, thought generator, and state evaluator, and other required params
“””
def __init__(self, model, search_algorithm):
self.model = model
self.search_algorithm = search_algorithm
def solve(self, x, k, T, b, vth):
if self.search_algorithm == ‘BFS’:
return self.tot_bfs(x, k, T, b)
elif self.search_algorithm == ‘DFS’:
return self.tot_dfs(x, k, T, vth)
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid search algorithm. Choose ‘BFS’ or ‘DFS’.”)
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
class OptimizedTreeofThoughts(TreeofThoughts):
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.parallel_generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.parallel_evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
class TerminalExecutor:
def __init__(self, config_file=”config.json”):
self.load_config(config_file)
def load_config(self, config_file):
with open(config_file, “r”) as f:
config = json.load(f)
self.allow_terminal_execution = config.get(“allow_terminal_execution”, False)
def execute(self, command):
if self.allow_terminal_execution:
try:
result = subprocess.run(command, shell=True, check=True, text=True, capture_output=True)
return result.stdout
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print(f”Error executing command: {e}”)
return None
else:
print(“Terminal execution is not allowed please enable it in the config file”)
return None
#example usage
executor = TerminalExecutor()
#test command execution
command = “echo ‘Hello, World'”
output = executor.execute(command)
if output:
print(f”Command output: {output}”)
# class SpecInterpreter:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def translate(self, spec):
# prompt = f”Create an architectural technical analysis with the architecture, classes, algorithms, and logic needed to create a {spec} in Python. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# translated_spec = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return translated_spec
# class TestGenerator:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def generate(self, spec):
# prompt = f”Generate a suite of unit tests in the most appropiate language for a the program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# unit_tests = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return unit_tests
# class ToTRunner:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def generate_program(self, spec, unit_tests):
# prompt = f”Generate an program in the language specified by the TestGenerator that meets the following product specification: {spec}. Use the following unit tests as an evaluation score: {unit_tests}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# program = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return program
class SpecInterpreter:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def translate(self, spec):
prompt = f”Create an architectural analysis in markdown in the most optimal programming language for a {spec}, provide the fastest, reliable architecture, and the break down that architecture into classes and algorithms needed to create {spec} If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
translated_spec = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return translated_spec
class TestGenerator:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def generate(self, spec):
prompt = f”Generate a suite of unit tests for a Python program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
unit_tests = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return unit_tests
class ToTRunner:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def generate_program(self, spec, unit_tests):
prompt = f”Generate a Python program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. Use the following unit tests as an evaluation score: {unit_tests}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
program = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return program
class TheCompiler:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor, search_algorithm=”DFS”):
self.spec_interpreter = SpecInterpreter(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.test_generator = TestGenerator(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.tot_runner = ToTRunner(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.tree_of_thoughts = OptimizedTreeofThoughts(LLM, search_algorithm)
def compile(self, input_spec, k, T, b, vth, timeout=None, confidence_threshold=None, max_iterations=None, convergence_threshold=None, convergence_count=None):
while True:
translated_spec = self.spec_interpreter.translate(input_spec)
if self.is_spec_complete(translated_spec):
unit_tests = self.test_generator.generate(translated_spec)
program = self.tot_runner.generate_program(translated_spec, unit_tests)
return program
#add a condition loop to break the if necessary
def is_spec_complete(self, translated_spec):
#implement an condition to check if the translated spec is complete
#for example you can check if the translated spec contains keywords or snippets
#return tree if the translated spec is complete otherwise return
pass
# Initialize the LLM
api_key = os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”, “”)
LLM = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(api_key)
# Initialize the TerminalExecutor
terminal_executor = TerminalExecutor(config_file=”config.json”)
# Initialize The Compiler with the LLM and TerminalExecutor
compiler = TheCompiler(LLM, terminal_executor)
# Example usage
input_spec = “Create a simple calculator that can perform addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division in python”
k = 10
T = 6
b = 10
vth = 1.0
timeout = 10
confidence = 1.0 #cmodel is confident on performance
max_iterations = 40 #tree branh nodes
convergence_threshold = 0.01
convergence_count = 5
# Call the compile method with the input problem and other params
solution = compiler.compile(input_spec, k, T, b, vth, timeout, confidence_threshold=confidence, max_iterations=max_iterations, convergence_threshold=convergence_threshold, convergence_count=convergence_count)
# Use the solution
print(f”solution: {solution}”)
# Extract terminal commands from the solution
terminal_commands = re.findall(r”TerminalCommand: (.+)”, solution)
# Execute terminal commands
for command in terminal_commands:
output = terminal_executor.execute(command)
if output:
print(f”Command output: {output}”)”
To wrap the code in a Streamlit interface and allow user input, you can follow these steps:
1. Install Streamlit by running the following command in your terminal:
“`
pip install streamlit
“`
2. Create a new Python file, e.g., `app.py`, and import the necessary libraries:
“`python
import streamlit as st
import subprocess
import json
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
import os
import re
import time
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
“`
3. Copy and paste the code from `the_compiler.py` into `app.py`.
4. Modify the code to accept user input by replacing the hard-coded values with Streamlit input widgets. For example, you can replace the hard-coded OpenAI API key with a text input field:
“`python
api_key = st.text_input(“Enter your OpenAI API key:”)
“`
You can similarly add input fields for other parameters that you want to make configurable.
5. Replace any print statements with Streamlit output functions. For example, replace `print(thoughts)` with `st.write(thoughts)`.
6. Replace the terminal execution logic with Streamlit’s `subprocess.run` function. For example, replace the `TerminalExecutor` class with the following code:
“`python
class TerminalExecutor:
def __init__(self, config_file=”config.json”):
self.load_config(config_file)
def load_config(self, config_file):
with open(config_file, “r”) as f:
config = json.load(f)
self.allow_terminal_execution = config.get(“allow_terminal_execution”, False)
def execute(self, command):
if self.allow_terminal_execution:
try:
result = subprocess.run(command, shell=True, check=True, text=True, capture_output=True)
return result.stdout
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
st.error(f”Error executing command: {e}”)
return None
else:
st.warning(“Terminal execution is not allowed. Please enable it in the config file.”)
return None
“`
7. Wrap the code inside a Streamlit app function and add Streamlit input and output widgets. For example:
“`python
def main():
# Streamlit app code here
if __name__ == “__main__”:
main()
“`
8. Add Streamlit input and output widgets as necessary to gather user input and display the output. You can use Streamlit’s various input and output functions like `st.text_input`, `st.button`, `st.write`, etc.
9. Run the Streamlit app by executing the following command in your terminal:
“`
streamlit run app.py
“`
This will start the Streamlit development server, and you can access the app in your web browser at the provided URL.
10. Continue modifying the code and adding Streamlit widgets as needed to provide a complete user interface for the compiler.
explain: class AbstractLanguageModel(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
pass
@abstractmethod
def evaluate_states(self, states):
pass
The code snippet provided defines an abstract class called `AbstractLanguageModel` that serves as a blueprint for creating language models. It uses the `ABC` (Abstract Base Class) module from the Python `abc` package to declare the class as an abstract class.
An abstract class is a class that cannot be instantiated directly and is intended to be subclassed. It provides a common interface and defines some abstract methods that must be implemented by its subclasses.
In this case, the `AbstractLanguageModel` class declares two abstract methods:
1. `generate_thoughts(self, state, k)`: This method takes in a `state` and an integer `k` as parameters and is responsible for generating thoughts or outputs based on the given state. The implementation details of this method are left to the subclasses.
2. `evaluate_states(self, states)`: This method takes in a list of `states` as a parameter and is responsible for evaluating and scoring the given states. Again, the specific implementation of this method is left to the subclasses.
By declaring these methods as abstract using the `@abstractmethod` decorator, the `AbstractLanguageModel` class enforces that any concrete subclass that derives from it must implement these methods. This ensures that any subclass of `AbstractLanguageModel` will provide an implementation for generating thoughts and evaluating states, making it easier to define and work with different language models.
explain: for state in states:
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=10,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
The code snippet provided represents a loop that iterates over a list of `states` and performs a text completion using OpenAI’s `text-davinci-003` language model to generate a response for each state.
Here’s a breakdown of the code:
1. The loop iterates over each `state` in the `states` list.
2. Inside the loop, the `state` is converted into a string representation by joining its elements with spaces. This is done using the `’ ‘.join(state)` expression, where `state` is a list of strings.
3. The `state_text` variable holds the resulting string representation of the current `state`.
4. A prompt string is constructed using an f-string. The prompt includes the current state as part of the reasoning and asks the language model to evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1.
5. The `openai.Completion.create()` method is called to generate a response for the prompt. This method sends the prompt to OpenAI’s text completion API and retrieves a completion.
– The `engine` parameter specifies the language model to use, in this case, the `text-davinci-003` engine.
– The `prompt` parameter provides the text prompt for the model to continue.
– The `n` parameter specifies the number of completions to generate. In this case, it’s set to 1.
– The `max_tokens` parameter sets the maximum number of tokens in the generated completion. It’s set to 10 in this example.
– The `stop` parameter, when set to `None`, allows the completion to continue until reaching the `max_tokens` limit.
– The `temperature` parameter controls the randomness of the generated text. A higher value (e.g., 0.8) produces more random output, while a lower value (e.g., 0.2) produces more deterministic output. In this case, it’s set to 0.5.
The code snippet demonstrates how to generate responses for multiple states by looping through them and utilizing the OpenAI text completion API to generate completions based on a given prompt.
What does this do? “class TreeofThoughts:
“””
1. Thought Decomposition –> based on problem properties
2. Thought Generator -> create a thought generator function G(p0, s, k) with 2 strategies a sample iid thoughts from a cot prompt b. propose thoughts
sequentially using a propose prompt
3. create a state evaluator function V(p0, S) with 2 strategies a value each state independently b. vote across states
4. Choose a search algo based on tree structure [BFS or DFS]
Implement chosen search algorithm for bfs (algo1):
init S0 with the input x
for t = 1 to T (step limit):
generate candidate thoughts for each state in St-1
eveluate the candiate states using the state evaluator V
select the b most promising states for St
return the final output by genertaing the thought for the best state in St for DFS(algo2)
defien a recurseive DFS function with the current state s, step t, and other required params
if t > T record the output by generating the thought for current state S
for each candidate state s in the sorted list of generated thoughts for s:
if the evaluated value of s is greater the the threshold of vth call the dfs function recursively
with s and t + 1
execute the chosen search algo with the input problem, thought generator, and state evaluator, and other required params
“”””
The code snippet you provided defines a class named `TreeofThoughts` that appears to represent a tree-based thought generation and evaluation algorithm. Here’s an overview of the functionality described in the code comments:
1. Thought Decomposition: This step involves breaking down a given problem into smaller components or properties that can be further analyzed.
2. Thought Generator: The class defines a thought generator function `G(p0, s, k)` with two strategies:
a. Sampling independent and identically distributed (IID) thoughts from a cot (context of thought) prompt.
b. Proposing thoughts sequentially using a propose prompt.
3. State Evaluator: The class defines a state evaluator function `V(p0, S)` with two strategies:
a. Evaluating each state independently and assigning a value to it.
b. Voting across states to determine their relative values.
4. Search Algorithm Selection: Based on the tree structure, either breadth-first search (BFS) or depth-first search (DFS) algorithm is chosen.
a. BFS Algorithm (algo1) Implementation:
– Initialize the initial state `S0` with the input `x`.
– Iterate for `t` from 1 to `T` (a step limit):
– Generate candidate thoughts for each state in the previous step `St-1`.
– Evaluate the candidate states using the state evaluator function `V`.
– Select the `b` most promising states for the current step `St`.
– Return the final output by generating the thought for the best state in `St`.
b. DFS Algorithm (algo2) Implementation:
– Define a recursive DFS function with the current state `s`, step `t`, and other required parameters.
– If `t` exceeds `T`, record the output by generating the thought for the current state `S`.
– For each candidate state `s` in the sorted list of generated thoughts for `s`:
– If the evaluated value of `s` is greater than the threshold of `vth`, call the DFS function recursively with `s` and `t + 1`.
5. Execute the Chosen Search Algorithm: The class defines a method or function to execute the chosen search algorithm, which takes input problem, thought generator, state evaluator, and other required parameters.
The provided code comments outline the high-level steps involved in the thought generation and evaluation process using a tree-based search algorithm. However, please note that the code comments do not provide the actual implementation details of the methods or functions mentioned.
This is the code for the above comment:def __init__(self, model, search_algorithm):
self.model = model
self.search_algorithm = search_algorithm
def solve(self, x, k, T, b, vth):
if self.search_algorithm == ‘BFS’:
return self.tot_bfs(x, k, T, b)
elif self.search_algorithm == ‘DFS’:
return self.tot_dfs(x, k, T, vth)
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid search algorithm. Choose ‘BFS’ or ‘DFS’.”)
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
The provided code corresponds to the implementation of the `TreeofThoughts` class described earlier. Here’s a breakdown of the code and its functionality:
1. The `__init__` method initializes an instance of the `TreeofThoughts` class with a given `model` (thought generation and evaluation model) and a chosen `search_algorithm` (either ‘BFS’ or ‘DFS’).
2. The `solve` method is responsible for solving a given problem by invoking the appropriate search algorithm based on the chosen `search_algorithm` value. It takes inputs `x` (initial state), `k` (number of candidate thoughts to generate), `T` (step limit), `b` (number of promising states to select for each step in BFS), and `vth` (threshold value for DFS).
3. The `tot_bfs` method implements the breadth-first search (BFS) algorithm. It starts by initializing the initial state `S0` with the input `x`. Then, for each step `t` from 1 to `T`, it generates candidate thoughts for each state in `S0` using the `model.generate_thoughts` method. The candidate states are represented as tuples obtained by appending a new thought (`z`) to each state in `S0`. The `model.evaluate_states` method is used to evaluate the candidate states and obtain their respective values (`Vt`). The candidate states are then sorted based on their values (`Vt`) in descending order and the top `b` states are selected for the next step (`St`). Finally, the best state in `St` is used to generate a single thought using the `model.generate_thoughts` method, which is returned as the final output.
4. The `tot_dfs` method implements the depth-first search (DFS) algorithm. It first initializes an empty list `output` to store the generated thoughts. The `dfs` function is defined inside `tot_dfs` and is responsible for recursively exploring the search space. It takes a current state `s` and a step `t`. If `t` exceeds `T`, meaning the step limit has been reached, it appends the thought generated from the current state (`s`) to the `output` list. Otherwise, it iterates over the sorted list of candidate thoughts (`s_prime`) generated from the current state using `model.generate_thoughts`. If the evaluated value of `s_prime` is greater than the threshold `vth`, the `dfs` function is recursively called with the updated state (`(*s, s_prime)`) and the next step (`t + 1`).
5. The `tot_dfs` method invokes the `dfs` function with the initial state `x` and the first step (`1`). After the DFS algorithm completes, it returns the `output` list containing the generated thoughts.
The code provides an implementation of both BFS and DFS algorithms for thought generation and evaluation based on the chosen search algorithm.
rewrite this as a streamlit app: “#autonmous agent load balancing add more agents to spec interpreter, add more agents to spec generate or unit tester, default is 3 1 for each, use your own llms, starcoder, reinforcement backed individual agent learning, particle swarm tree of thoughts -> run tree of thoughts on the space of all thoughts ran by agents as trees of an networked swarm system, use autogpt config and env with embedding retriveal search, map all thoughts to an embedding database, while now tester is not done keep running in a while loop, agentgpt with autoforestgpt, program optimizer agent works in unison with the generator to optimize code. Create 5 optimizations for this code: {code}, for generator ask generator to ask questions about spec and unit test and then answer those questions by transforming it into algoritmic pseudoce then code with the logic, also add spawns where boss node spawns new agents for each task, https://github.com/Araq/malebolgia, have agent select programming langauges and infrastcuture to pass into the unit tester and generator, prompt, each agent stops when the tree has found an optimal solution
#inital implementation of the compiler
import subprocess
import json
import re
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
import os
import re
import time
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
class AbstractLanguageModel(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
pass
@abstractmethod
def evaluate_states(self, states):
pass
class CustomLanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
#implement the thought generation logic using self.model
pass
def evaluate_states(self, states):
#implement state evaluation logic using self.model
pass
class OpenAILanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”):
openai.api_key = api_key
self.strategy = strategy
self.evaluation_strategy = evaluation_strategy
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, generate {k} coherent thoughts to continue the reasoning process:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=k,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
thoughts = [choice.text.strip() for choice in response.choices]
print(thoughts)
return thoughts
def evaluate_states(self, states):
if self.evaluation_strategy == ‘value’:
state_values = {}
for state in states:
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=10,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
try:
# print(response.choices[0].text.strip())
value = float(response.choices[0].text.strip())
print(value)
except ValueError:
value = 0 # Assign a default value if the conversion fails
state_values[state] = value
return state_values
elif self.evaluation_strategy == ‘vote’:
states_text = ‘n’.join([‘ ‘.join(state) for state in states])
prompt = f”Given the following states of reasoning, vote for the best state:n{states_text}nnVote:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
best_state_text = response.choices[0].text.strip()
print(best_state_text)
best_state = tuple(best_state_text.split())
return {state: 1 if state == best_state else 0 for state in states}
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid evaluation strategy. Choose ‘value’ or ‘vote’.”)
class OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(OpenAILanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”, cache_enabled=True):
super().__init__(api_key, strategy, evaluation_strategy)
self.cache_enabled = cache_enabled
self.thought_cache = {}
self.state_evaluation_cache = {}
def parallel_generate_thoughts(self, states, k):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
thoughts = list(executor.map(lambda state: self.generate_thoughts(state, k), states))
print(thoughts)
return thoughts
def parallel_evaluate_states(self, states):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
state_values = list(executor.map(self.evaluate_states, states))
print(state_values)
return state_values
# model = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(‘your_openai_api_key_here’)
#update tree of thoughts to use optimized models mehtods
class TreeofThoughts:
“””
1. Thought Decomposition –> based on problem properties
2. Thought Generator -> create a thought generator function G(p0, s, k) with 2 strategies a sample iid thoughts from a cot prompt b. propose thoughts
sequentially using a propose prompt
3. create a state evaluator function V(p0, S) with 2 strategies a value each state independently b. vote across states
4. Choose a search algo based on tree structure [BFS or DFS]
Implement chosen search algorithm for bfs (algo1):
init S0 with the input x
for t = 1 to T (step limit):
generate candidate thoughts for each state in St-1
eveluate the candiate states using the state evaluator V
select the b most promising states for St
return the final output by genertaing the thought for the best state in St for DFS(algo2)
defien a recurseive DFS function with the current state s, step t, and other required params
if t > T record the output by generating the thought for current state S
for each candidate state s in the sorted list of generated thoughts for s:
if the evaluated value of s is greater the the threshold of vth call the dfs function recursively
with s and t + 1
execute the chosen search algo with the input problem, thought generator, and state evaluator, and other required params
“””
def __init__(self, model, search_algorithm):
self.model = model
self.search_algorithm = search_algorithm
def solve(self, x, k, T, b, vth):
if self.search_algorithm == ‘BFS’:
return self.tot_bfs(x, k, T, b)
elif self.search_algorithm == ‘DFS’:
return self.tot_dfs(x, k, T, vth)
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid search algorithm. Choose ‘BFS’ or ‘DFS’.”)
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
class OptimizedTreeofThoughts(TreeofThoughts):
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.parallel_generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.parallel_evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
class TerminalExecutor:
def __init__(self, config_file=”config.json”):
self.load_config(config_file)
def load_config(self, config_file):
with open(config_file, “r”) as f:
config = json.load(f)
self.allow_terminal_execution = config.get(“allow_terminal_execution”, False)
def execute(self, command):
if self.allow_terminal_execution:
try:
result = subprocess.run(command, shell=True, check=True, text=True, capture_output=True)
return result.stdout
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print(f”Error executing command: {e}”)
return None
else:
print(“Terminal execution is not allowed please enable it in the config file”)
return None
#example usage
executor = TerminalExecutor()
#test command execution
command = “echo ‘Hello, World'”
output = executor.execute(command)
if output:
print(f”Command output: {output}”)
# class SpecInterpreter:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def translate(self, spec):
# prompt = f”Create an architectural technical analysis with the architecture, classes, algorithms, and logic needed to create a {spec} in Python. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# translated_spec = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return translated_spec
# class TestGenerator:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def generate(self, spec):
# prompt = f”Generate a suite of unit tests in the most appropiate language for a the program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# unit_tests = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return unit_tests
# class ToTRunner:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def generate_program(self, spec, unit_tests):
# prompt = f”Generate an program in the language specified by the TestGenerator that meets the following product specification: {spec}. Use the following unit tests as an evaluation score: {unit_tests}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# program = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return program
class SpecInterpreter:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def translate(self, spec):
prompt = f”Create an architectural analysis in markdown in the most optimal programming language for a {spec}, provide the fastest, reliable architecture, and the break down that architecture into classes and algorithms needed to create {spec} If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
translated_spec = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return translated_spec
class TestGenerator:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def generate(self, spec):
prompt = f”Generate a suite of unit tests for a Python program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
unit_tests = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return unit_tests
class ToTRunner:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def generate_program(self, spec, unit_tests):
prompt = f”Generate a Python program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. Use the following unit tests as an evaluation score: {unit_tests}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
program = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return program
class TheCompiler:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor, search_algorithm=”DFS”):
self.spec_interpreter = SpecInterpreter(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.test_generator = TestGenerator(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.tot_runner = ToTRunner(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.tree_of_thoughts = OptimizedTreeofThoughts(LLM, search_algorithm)
def compile(self, input_spec, k, T, b, vth, timeout=None, confidence_threshold=None, max_iterations=None, convergence_threshold=None, convergence_count=None):
while True:
translated_spec = self.spec_interpreter.translate(input_spec)
if self.is_spec_complete(translated_spec):
unit_tests = self.test_generator.generate(translated_spec)
program = self.tot_runner.generate_program(translated_spec, unit_tests)
return program
#add a condition loop to break the if necessary
def is_spec_complete(self, translated_spec):
#implement an condition to check if the translated spec is complete
#for example you can check if the translated spec contains keywords or snippets
#return tree if the translated spec is complete otherwise return
pass
# Initialize the LLM
api_key = os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”, “”)
LLM = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(api_key)
# Initialize the TerminalExecutor
terminal_executor = TerminalExecutor(config_file=”config.json”)
# Initialize The Compiler with the LLM and TerminalExecutor
compiler = TheCompiler(LLM, terminal_executor)
# Example usage
input_spec = “Create a program that displays 1,000,000 iterations of a mandelbrot set”
k = 10
T = 6
b = 10
vth = 1.0
timeout = 10
confidence = 1.0 #cmodel is confident on performance
max_iterations = 40 #tree branh nodes
convergence_threshold = 0.01
convergence_count = 5
# Call the compile method with the input problem and other params
solution = compiler.compile(input_spec, k, T, b, vth, timeout, confidence_threshold=confidence, max_iterations=max_iterations, convergence_threshold=convergence_threshold, convergence_count=convergence_count)
# Use the solution
print(f”solution: {solution}”)
# Extract terminal commands from the solution
terminal_commands = re.findall(r”TerminalCommand: (.+)”, solution)
# Execute terminal commands
for command in terminal_commands:
output = terminal_executor.execute(command)
if output:
print(f”Command output: {output}”)”
rewrite this as a streamlit app include a column that displays all output as a scrolling list. Include a timer: ”
#inital implementation of the compiler
import subprocess
import json
import re
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
import os
import re
import time
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
class AbstractLanguageModel(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
pass
@abstractmethod
def evaluate_states(self, states):
pass
class CustomLanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
#implement the thought generation logic using self.model
pass
def evaluate_states(self, states):
#implement state evaluation logic using self.model
pass
class OpenAILanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”):
openai.api_key = api_key
self.strategy = strategy
self.evaluation_strategy = evaluation_strategy
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, generate {k} coherent thoughts to continue the reasoning process:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=k,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
thoughts = [choice.text.strip() for choice in response.choices]
print(thoughts)
return thoughts
def evaluate_states(self, states):
if self.evaluation_strategy == ‘value’:
state_values = {}
for state in states:
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=10,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
try:
# print(response.choices[0].text.strip())
value = float(response.choices[0].text.strip())
print(value)
except ValueError:
value = 0 # Assign a default value if the conversion fails
state_values[state] = value
return state_values
elif self.evaluation_strategy == ‘vote’:
states_text = ‘n’.join([‘ ‘.join(state) for state in states])
prompt = f”Given the following states of reasoning, vote for the best state:n{states_text}nnVote:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
best_state_text = response.choices[0].text.strip()
print(best_state_text)
best_state = tuple(best_state_text.split())
return {state: 1 if state == best_state else 0 for state in states}
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid evaluation strategy. Choose ‘value’ or ‘vote’.”)
class OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(OpenAILanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”, cache_enabled=True):
super().__init__(api_key, strategy, evaluation_strategy)
self.cache_enabled = cache_enabled
self.thought_cache = {}
self.state_evaluation_cache = {}
def parallel_generate_thoughts(self, states, k):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
thoughts = list(executor.map(lambda state: self.generate_thoughts(state, k), states))
print(thoughts)
return thoughts
def parallel_evaluate_states(self, states):
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
state_values = list(executor.map(self.evaluate_states, states))
print(state_values)
return state_values
# model = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(‘your_openai_api_key_here’)
#update tree of thoughts to use optimized models mehtods
class TreeofThoughts:
def __init__(self, model, search_algorithm):
self.model = model
self.search_algorithm = search_algorithm
def solve(self, x, k, T, b, vth):
if self.search_algorithm == ‘BFS’:
return self.tot_bfs(x, k, T, b)
elif self.search_algorithm == ‘DFS’:
return self.tot_dfs(x, k, T, vth)
else:
raise ValueError(“Invalid search algorithm. Choose ‘BFS’ or ‘DFS’.”)
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
class OptimizedTreeofThoughts(TreeofThoughts):
def tot_bfs(self, x, k, T, b):
S0 = {x}
for t in range(1, T + 1):
S0_t = {(*s, z) for s in S0 for z in self.model.parallel_generate_thoughts(s, k)}
Vt = self.model.parallel_evaluate_states(S0_t)
St = sorted(S0_t, key=lambda s: Vt[s], reverse=True)[:b]
S0 = set(St)
return self.model.generate_thoughts(max(St, key=lambda s: Vt[s]), 1)
def tot_dfs(self, x, k, T, vth):
output = []
def dfs(s, t):
if t > T:
output.append(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, 1))
return
for s_prime in sorted(self.model.generate_thoughts(s, k)):
if self.model.evaluate_states({s_prime})[s_prime] > vth:
dfs((*s, s_prime), t + 1)
dfs(x, 1)
return output
class TerminalExecutor:
def __init__(self, config_file=”config.json”):
self.load_config(config_file)
def load_config(self, config_file):
with open(config_file, “r”) as f:
config = json.load(f)
self.allow_terminal_execution = config.get(“allow_terminal_execution”, False)
def execute(self, command):
if self.allow_terminal_execution:
try:
result = subprocess.run(command, shell=True, check=True, text=True, capture_output=True)
return result.stdout
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print(f”Error executing command: {e}”)
return None
else:
print(“Terminal execution is not allowed please enable it in the config file”)
return None
#example usage
executor = TerminalExecutor()
#test command execution
command = “echo ‘Hello, World'”
output = executor.execute(command)
if output:
print(f”Command output: {output}”)
# class SpecInterpreter:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def translate(self, spec):
# prompt = f”Create an architectural technical analysis with the architecture, classes, algorithms, and logic needed to create a {spec} in Python. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# translated_spec = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return translated_spec
# class TestGenerator:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def generate(self, spec):
# prompt = f”Generate a suite of unit tests in the most appropiate language for a the program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# unit_tests = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return unit_tests
# class ToTRunner:
# def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
# self.LLM = LLM
# self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
# def generate_program(self, spec, unit_tests):
# prompt = f”Generate an program in the language specified by the TestGenerator that meets the following product specification: {spec}. Use the following unit tests as an evaluation score: {unit_tests}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
# program = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
# return program
class SpecInterpreter:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def translate(self, spec):
prompt = f”Create an architectural analysis in markdown in the most optimal programming language for a {spec}, provide the fastest, reliable architecture, and the break down that architecture into classes and algorithms needed to create {spec} If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
translated_spec = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return translated_spec
class TestGenerator:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def generate(self, spec):
prompt = f”Generate a suite of unit tests for a Python program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
unit_tests = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return unit_tests
class ToTRunner:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor):
self.LLM = LLM
self.terminal_executor = terminal_executor
def generate_program(self, spec, unit_tests):
prompt = f”Generate a Python program that meets the following product specification: {spec}. Use the following unit tests as an evaluation score: {unit_tests}. If any terminal commands are needed, provide them in the format ‘TerminalCommand: ‘.”
program = self.LLM.generate_thoughts(prompt, 1)[0]
return program
class TheCompiler:
def __init__(self, LLM, terminal_executor, search_algorithm=”DFS”):
self.spec_interpreter = SpecInterpreter(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.test_generator = TestGenerator(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.tot_runner = ToTRunner(LLM, terminal_executor)
self.tree_of_thoughts = OptimizedTreeofThoughts(LLM, search_algorithm)
def compile(self, input_spec, k, T, b, vth, timeout=None, confidence_threshold=None, max_iterations=None, convergence_threshold=None, convergence_count=None):
while True:
translated_spec = self.spec_interpreter.translate(input_spec)
if self.is_spec_complete(translated_spec):
unit_tests = self.test_generator.generate(translated_spec)
program = self.tot_runner.generate_program(translated_spec, unit_tests)
return program
#add a condition loop to break the if necessary
def is_spec_complete(self, translated_spec):
#implement an condition to check if the translated spec is complete
#for example you can check if the translated spec contains keywords or snippets
#return tree if the translated spec is complete otherwise return
pass
# Initialize the LLM
api_key = os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”, “”)
LLM = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(api_key)
# Initialize the TerminalExecutor
terminal_executor = TerminalExecutor(config_file=”config.json”)
# Initialize The Compiler with the LLM and TerminalExecutor
compiler = TheCompiler(LLM, terminal_executor)
# Example usage
input_spec = ” ”
k = 10
T = 6
b = 10
vth = 1.0
timeout = 10
confidence = 1.0 #cmodel is confident on performance
max_iterations = 40 #tree branh nodes
convergence_threshold = 0.01
convergence_count = 5
# Call the compile method with the input problem and other params
solution = compiler.compile(input_spec, k, T, b, vth, timeout, confidence_threshold=confidence, max_iterations=max_iterations, convergence_threshold=convergence_threshold, convergence_count=convergence_count)
# Use the solution
print(f”solution: {solution}”)
# Extract terminal commands from the solution
terminal_commands = re.findall(r”TerminalCommand: (.+)”, solution)
# Execute terminal commands
for command in terminal_commands:
output = terminal_executor.execute(command)
if output:
print(f”Command output: {output}”)”
To rewrite the given code as a Streamlit app, you can follow these steps:
1. Import the necessary libraries:
“`python
import streamlit as st
“`
2. Define a function to create the Streamlit app:
“`python
def main():
st.title(“Autonomous Agent Load Balancing”)
# Add the Streamlit app code here
“`
3. Inside the `main` function, add the Streamlit app code that corresponds to the functionality described in the given code. For example, you can create input fields, buttons, and output sections using Streamlit’s API.
4. Replace any print statements with Streamlit’s `st.write()` or `st.text()` functions to display output to the user.
5. Run the Streamlit app:
“`python
if __name__ == “__main__”:
main()
“`
Here’s an example of how the Streamlit app code might look:
“`python
import streamlit as st
def main():
st.title(“Autonomous Agent Load Balancing”)
st.header(“Initial Implementation of the Compiler”)
st.write(“# Autonmous Agent Load Balancing”)
st.write(“Add more agents to spec interpreter and spec generator or unit tester. The default is 3 agents: 1 for each. Use your own LLMS, starcoder, reinforcement-backed individual agent learning, particle swarm tree of thoughts. Run tree
To create a Streamlit app for the given code, we need to follow these steps:
1. Install the necessary libraries by running the following command:
“`shell
pip install streamlit openai
“`
2. Create a new Python file, for example, `compiler_app.py`, and add the following code to it:
“`python
import streamlit as st
import subprocess
import json
import re
import concurrent.futures
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
import openai
import os
import time
# Set up OpenAI API key
openai.api_key = os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”, “”)
# TerminalExecutor class
class TerminalExecutor:
def __init__(self, config_file=”config.json”):
self.load_config(config_file)
def load_config(self, config_file):
with open(config_file, “r”) as f:
config = json.load(f)
self.allow_terminal_execution = config.get(“allow_terminal_execution”, False)
def execute(self, command):
if self.allow_terminal_execution:
try:
result = subprocess.run(
command, shell=True, check=True, text=True, capture_output=True
)
return result.stdout
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
st.error(f”Error executing command: {e}”)
return None
else:
st.warning(“Terminal execution is not allowed. Please enable it in the config file.”)
return None
# AbstractLanguageModel class
class AbstractLanguageModel(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
pass
@abstractmethod
def evaluate_states(self, states):
pass
# CustomLanguageModel class
class CustomLanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, model):
self.model = model
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
# implement the thought generation logic using self.model
pass
def evaluate_states(self, states):
# implement state evaluation logic using self.model
pass
# OpenAILanguageModel class
class OpenAILanguageModel(AbstractLanguageModel):
def __init__(self, api_key, strategy=”cot”, evaluation_strategy=”value”):
self.strategy = strategy
self.evaluation_strategy = evaluation_strategy
def generate_thoughts(self, state, k):
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, generate {k} coherent thoughts to continue the reasoning process:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=k,
max_tokens=50,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
thoughts = [choice.text.strip() for choice in response.choices]
return thoughts
def evaluate_states(self, states):
if self.evaluation_strategy == ‘value’:
state_values = {}
for state in states:
state_text = ‘ ‘.join(state)
prompt = f”Given the current state of reasoning: ‘{state_text}’, evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=1,
max_tokens=10,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
try:
value = float(response.choices[0].text.strip())
except ValueError:
value = 0 # Assign a default value if the conversion fails
state_values[state] = value
return state_values
elif self.evaluation_strategy == ‘vote’:
states_text = ‘n’.join
.
continue
(states)
prompt = f”Given the current states of reasoning:n{states_text}nEvaluate their quality and rank them in descending order of coherence:”
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=”text-davinci-003″,
prompt=prompt,
n=len(states),
max_tokens=10,
stop=None,
temperature=0.5,
)
ranked_states = [choice.text.strip() for choice in response.choices]
return ranked_states
# Helper function to compile and run code
def compile_and_run_code(code):
# Compile code
compilation_output = executor.execute(f”python -m py_compile {code}”)
if compilation_output is None:
return None
# Extract compiled file name
match = re.search(r”Files”(S+)””, compilation_output)
if match is None:
return None
compiled_file = match.group(1)
# Run compiled code
execution_output = executor.execute(f”python {compiled_file}”)
return execution_output
# Streamlit app
def main():
st.title(“Reasoning Compiler”)
# Configure TerminalExecutor
executor = TerminalExecutor()
# Code input
code = st.text_area(“Enter your code here”)
# Compile and run button
if st.button(“Compile and Run”):
if code:
st.info(“Compiling and running code…”)
execution_output = compile_and_run_code(code)
if execution_output:
st.code(execution_output, language=”python”)
else:
st.error(“Error occurred during compilation or execution.”)
# Configuration options
st.sidebar.title(“Configuration”)
allow_terminal_execution = st.sidebar.checkbox(“Allow Terminal Execution”, value=executor.allow_terminal_execution)
if allow_terminal_execution != executor.allow_terminal_execution:
executor.allow_terminal_execution = allow_terminal_execution
st.info(“Configuration updated. Please recompile and run the code.”)
st.sidebar.markdown(“—“)
st.sidebar.title(“About”)
st.sidebar.info(
“This app allows you to compile and run Python code. ”
“It provides a configurable option to allow or disallow terminal execution. ”
“When terminal execution is enabled, the code can run terminal commands. ”
“When terminal execution is disabled, terminal commands will not be executed.”
)
if __name__ == “__main__”:
main()
“`
3. Save the file and run it using the following command:
“`shell
streamlit run compiler_app.py
“`
4. The Streamlit app will be launched in your web browser. You can enter your code in the text area and click the “Compile and Run” button to compile and run the code. The execution output will be displayed below the button.
Note: Make sure you have set up the OpenAI API key correctly. You can either set it as an environment variable named “OPENAI_API_KEY” or directly replace `os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”, “”)` with your API key.
is this all one file?
Apologies for the confusion. The code provided consists of multiple parts and should be split into separate files as follows:
1. `reasoning_compiler.py`: This file contains the main logic for compiling and running code, as well as the Streamlit app. It should be saved as `reasoning_compiler.py`.
2. `terminal_executor.py`: This file contains the `TerminalExecutor` class, which handles the execution of terminal commands. It should be saved as `terminal_executor.py` and placed in the same directory as `reasoning_compiler.py`.
To summarize, you need to create two separate files: `reasoning_compiler.py` and `terminal_executor.py`. Copy the corresponding code sections into their respective files, and save them in the same directory. Once you have both files, you can run `reasoning_compiler.py` using the command `streamlit run reasoning_compiler.py` to launch the Streamlit app.
I apologize for any confusion caused. Let me know if you have any further questions!
rewrite both files again so they are within each seperate code blocks
rewrite both files reasoning_compiler.py and terminal_executor.py again so they are within each separate code blocks
Certainly! I apologize for the confusion earlier. Here’s the code for each file:
`reasoning_compiler.py`:
“`python
import subprocess
import json
import re
import streamlit as st
import os
# Import the necessary classes and functions from other files
Certainly! Here’s the revised code for the `reasoning_compiler.py` file:
“`python
import streamlit as st
import subprocess
import json
import re
import os
# Import the necessary classes from the previous code
# …
# Initialize the LLM
api_key = os.environ.get(“OPENAI_API_KEY”, “”)
LLM = OptimizedOpenAILanguageModel(api_key)
# Initialize the TerminalExecutor
terminal_executor = TerminalExecutor(config_file=”config.json”)
# Initialize The Compiler with the LLM and TerminalExecutor
compiler = TheCompiler(LLM, terminal_executor)
# Streamlit App
def compile_code():
input_spec = st.text_input(“Input Specification”, “”)
k = 10
T = 6
b = 10
vth = 1.0
timeout = 10
confidence = 1.0 # model is confident on performance
max_iterations = 40 # tree branch nodes
convergence_threshold = 0.01
convergence_count = 5
if st.button(“Compile”):
# Call the compile method with the input problem and other parameters
solution = compiler.compile(
input_spec,
k,
T,
b,
vth,
timeout,
confidence_threshold=confidence,
max_iterations=max_iterations,
convergence_threshold=convergence_threshold,
convergence_count=convergence_count,
)
# Use the solution
st.text(f”Solution: {solution}”)
# Extract terminal commands from the solution
terminal_commands = re.findall(r”TerminalCommand: (.+)”, solution)
# Execute terminal commands
for command in terminal_commands:
output = terminal_executor.execute(command)
if output:
st.text(f”Command output: {output}”)
# Run the Streamlit app
if __name__ == “__main__”:
compile_code()
“`
And here’s the revised code for the `terminal_executor.py` file:
“`python
import subprocess
import json
class TerminalExecutor:
def __init__(self, config_file=”config.json”):
self.load_config(config_file)
def load_config(self, config_file):
with open(config_file, “r”) as f:
config = json.load(f)
self.allow_terminal_execution = config.get(“allow_terminal_execution”, False)
def execute(self, command):
if self.allow_terminal_execution:
try:
result = subprocess.run(
command, shell=True, check=True, text=True, capture_output=True
)
return result.stdout
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print(f”Error executing command: {e}”)
return None
else:
print(“Terminal execution is not allowed. Please enable it in the config file.”)
return None
“`
Save the first code block as `reasoning_compiler.py` and the second code block as `terminal_executor.py`. Make sure both files are in the same directory. Then, you can run `streamlit run reasoning_compiler.py` to launch the Streamlit app.
I apologize for any inconvenience caused. Let me know if you have any further questions!
python the_compiler.py
Command output: ‘Hello, World’
Traceback (most recent call last):
File “G:TheCompilerthe-compilerthe_compilerthe_compiler.py”, line 386, in
compile_code()
File “G:TheCompilerthe-compilerthe_compilerthe_compiler.py”, line 346, in compile_code
input_spec = st.text_input(“Input Specification”, “”)
NameError: name ‘st’ is not defined. Did you mean: ‘set’?
It seems that you are trying to execute the `the_compiler.py` file, which I don’t have access to. However, based on the error message you provided, it appears that there is an issue with the `st` object not being defined.
The `st` object is part of the Streamlit library, and it seems that you might have missed importing it in the `the_compiler.py` file. To fix this error, you need to add the following import statement at the top of the `the_compiler.py` file:
“`python
import streamlit as st
“`
Make sure to save the file after making this change, and then you can try running the `the_compiler.py` file again.
The outputs of the processes needs to be in the browser
To display the outputs of the processes in the browser using Streamlit, you can make the following modifications to the code:
“`python
# Import the necessary libraries
import subprocess
import streamlit as st
# Define the function to compile and execute the code
def compile_and_execute_code():
# Get the code from user input
code = st.text_area(“Enter your code here”, “”)
# Compile the code
compilation_process = subprocess.run([“python”, “-c”, code], capture_output=True, text=True)
compilation_output = compilation_process.stderr.strip()
# Display the compilation output
if compilation_output:
st.error(“Compilation Error:”)
st.code(compilation_output)
else:
st.success(“Compilation Successful!”)
# Execute the code
execution_process = subprocess.run([“python”, “-c”, code], capture_output=True, text=True)
execution_output = execution_process.stdout.strip()
# Display the execution output
if execution_output:
st.info(“Execution Output:”)
st.code(execution_output)
else:
st.warning(“No Output”)
# Run the function to compile and execute the code
compile_and_execute_code()
“`
With these modifications, the code will prompt the user to enter their code in a text area on the Streamlit web page. After the user submits the code, it will be compiled and executed. The compilation output (if any) will be displayed as an error, and the execution output (if any) will be displayed as information. If there is no output, a warning message will be displayed.
Please note that this code assumes the user will enter valid Python code to be executed.
This is an example of the output I want displayed in the application on the right column: streamlit run the_compiler.py
You can now view your Streamlit app in your browser.
Local URL: http://localhost:8501
Network URL: http://192.168.254.74:8501
Command output: ‘Hello, World’
Command output: ‘Hello, World’
Command output: ‘Hello, World’
[‘Analyze the different types of programming languages available and determine which one would be the most suitable for creating a Simple 3D Spinning Cube, and provide the necessary commands to implement the architecture.’]
[‘Develop an algorithm that will create the 3D spinning cube using the optimal programming language, and provide the necessary terminal commands to execute the algorithm.’]
[‘Create a system architecture diagram outlining the classes and algorithms needed to generate the Simple 3D Spinning Cube, and use the most optimal programming language to implement the architecture.’]
[‘Create a flow chart to illustrate the architecture of the Simple 3D Spinning Cube, and identify the functions and algorithms that are necessary to build the cube.’]
[‘Create a step-by-step guide outlining the coding process for creating the Simple 3D Spinning Cube, including any necessary terminal commands, in the most optimal programmi
To display the desired output in the Streamlit application, you can modify the code as follows:
“`python
# Import the necessary libraries
import subprocess
import streamlit as st
# Define the function to compile and execute the code
def compile_and_execute_code():
# Get the code from user input
code = st.text_area(“Enter your code here”, “”)
# Compile and execute the code
process = subprocess.Popen([“python”, “-c”, code], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, universal_newlines=True)
while True:
output = process.stdout.readline().strip()
if output == ” and process.poll() is not None:
break
if output:
st.text(“Command output: ” + output)
# Run the function to compile and execute the code
compile_and_execute_code()
“`
With these modifications, the code will prompt the user to enter their code in a text area on the Streamlit web page. After the user submits the code, it will be compiled and executed. The command outputs will be displayed in the right column of the Streamlit application.
Please note that this code assumes the user will enter valid Python code to be executed.
I want to use a huggingFace transformer in place of the openAi. Here is the two classes the first is the custom class which we will use and the second is the class used by openai. Help me complete the code for the custom class. What information do you need?
To help you complete the code for the custom class using Hugging Face transformers, I’ll need the following information:
1. The name of the Hugging Face transformer model you want to use.
2. The task or functionality you want to achieve with the model.
3. Any specific requirements or modifications you have in mind for the custom class.
Please provide the details mentioned above, and I’ll assist you in completing the code for the custom class using the Hugging Face transformer.
I want to first send the initial prompt from the user to a ‘prompt inspector’ to rewrite the prompt so it is more understandable, is this a thing?
Yes, it is possible to send the initial prompt from the user to a “prompt inspector” to rewrite or modify the prompt. This can be done using various techniques such as natural language processing, text summarization, or language generation models.
The prompt inspector can analyze the user’s input and apply transformations or modifications to make the prompt more understandable or refined. For example, it can perform tasks like:
1. Removing ambiguous or redundant phrases.
2. Rewriting the prompt in a clearer and more concise manner.
3. Summarizing the prompt to highlight the key points.
4. Adding context or background information to provide a better understanding.
By utilizing natural language processing and generation models, the prompt inspector can enhance the user’s input and generate a modified prompt that meets the desired criteria.
If you would like to implement a prompt inspector in your custom class, please provide more details on the specific requirements or modifications you have in mind for the prompt inspector.
My initial intention is to write a bot that will perform text-to-code. So the prompt inspector will need to be prompted to properly format any requests into a orderly spec sheet.
Understood. If your intention is to create a bot that performs text-to-code conversion and the prompt inspector’s role is to format requests into an orderly spec sheet, you can design the prompt inspector to handle the following tasks:
1. Parse and validate the user’s request: The prompt inspector can receive the user’s request and perform parsing and validation to ensure it follows a specific format or structure. This step helps ensure that the input is properly formatted and ready for further processing.
2. Extract relevant information: Once the request is validated, the prompt inspector can extract relevant information from the user’s input. This can involve identifying key requirements, specifications, or parameters needed for the code generation process.
3. Organize the information into a spec sheet: The prompt inspector can structure the extracted information into an orderly spec sheet or document. This may involve categorizing the details, defining input/output requirements, outlining desired functionality, specifying constraints, or any other relevant information needed for code generation.
4. Refine and clarify the specifications: The prompt inspector can further refine and clarify the specifications provided by the user. This may involve removing ambiguities, resolving conflicting requirements, expanding on certain details, or requesting additional information if necessary.
5. Generate a modified prompt: Finally, the prompt inspector can generate a modified prompt based on the organized spec sheet. This modified prompt can then be passed on to the code generation component to convert the text into executable code.
It’s important to note that the implementation details of the prompt inspector, including the specific techniques and algorithms used, will depend on your requirements and the complexity of the text-to-code conversion you want to achieve. You can leverage natural language processing, information extraction, and language generation techniques to build an effective prompt inspector.
Let me know if you need further assistance or if you have any specific requirements for the prompt inspector implementation.
What model should I focus on to best suit these goals?
To best suit your goals of text-to-code conversion and prompt modification, you can focus on language models that excel in natural language understanding, generation, and context manipulation. One popular and powerful model you can consider is OpenAI’s GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) series, which includes models like GPT-3 and GPT-4.
GPT models are known for their ability to understand and generate human-like text based on given prompts. They have been successfully applied to a wide range of natural language processing tasks, including text generation, question answering, summarization, and dialogue systems. GPT models can be fine-tuned on specific domains or tasks to improve their performance and adapt them to specific use cases.
However, it’s worth mentioning that GPT models are not specifically designed for code generation or understanding programming languages. While they can generate code-like text, the generated code may not always be syntactically correct or optimized. If your goal is to focus on code generation, you may also consider models that are specifically designed for programming tasks, such as GPT-Neo or CodeBERT.
GPT-Neo is a variant of the GPT model developed by EleutherAI, which offers larger and more accessible language models. It can be fine-tuned on programming-related datasets to enhance its ability to generate code. CodeBERT, on the other hand, is a language model specifically trained for programming tasks, including code generation, summarization, and retrieval. It can provide better code-related understanding and generation capabilities compared to general language models like GPT.
Ultimately, the choice of the model will depend on your specific requirements, available resources, and the complexity of the text-to-code conversion tasks you want to accomplish. You can experiment with different models, fine-tuning techniques, and datasets to find the best combination that suits your needs.
Using this transformer, write a script that will perform prompt inspecting using streamlit: from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(“mosaicml/mpt-7b-instruct”, trust_remote_code=True)
Certainly! Here’s an example script that uses the Hugging Face `transformers` library and Streamlit to perform prompt inspection using the MosaicML MPT-7B-Instruct model:
“`python
import streamlit as st
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
# Load the model and tokenizer
model_name = “mosaicml/mpt-7b-instruct”
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, trust_remote_code=True)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
# Streamlit app
def main():
st.title(“Prompt Inspector”)
# User input
prompt = st.text_area(“Enter your prompt”, “”)
if st.button(“Inspect Prompt”):
if prompt:
# Preprocess the prompt
encoded_prompt = tokenizer.encode(prompt, add_special_tokens=False, return_tensors=”pt”)
# Generate prompt inspection
with st.spinner(“Inspecting prompt…”):
outputs = model.generate(encoded_prompt, max_length=128)
inspected_prompt = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
# Display inspected prompt
st.success(“Inspected Prompt:”)
st.code(inspected_prompt, language=”text”)
else:
st.warning(“Please enter a prompt.”)
if __name__ == “__main__”:
main()
“`
This script sets up a Streamlit app with a text area where you can enter your prompt. When you click the “Inspect Prompt” button, it preprocesses the prompt, generates the prompt inspection using the MPT-7B-Instruct model, and displays the inspected prompt using Streamlit’s `code` component.
Make sure you have the necessary dependencies installed (`streamlit` and `transformers`) before running the script. You can run the script using the command `streamlit run script.py` (assuming the script is saved as `script.py`).
Note that the example above assumes that the MPT-7B-Instruct model from the “mosaicml/mpt-7b-instruct” checkpoint is available and can be loaded using the `AutoModelForCausalLM` and `AutoTokenizer` classes from the Hugging Face `transformers` library. If the model is not available or you want to use a different model, make sure to update the `model_name` variable accordingly.
Should the prompt inspector be prompted initially to define its task ?
Yes, it can be beneficial to prompt the prompt inspector initially to define its task. By providing a specific instruction or guideline to the prompt inspector, you can guide its behavior and ensure that it generates prompt inspections that align with your desired objectives.
Prompting the prompt inspector can be done by including an initial prompt or question that specifies the task or goal of the prompt inspection. For example, you can modify the Streamlit app script I provided earlier to include an additional input field where you can enter the prompt for the prompt inspector’s task. Here’s an updated version of the script:
“`python
import streamlit as st
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
# Load the model and tokenizer
model_name = “mosaicml/mpt-7b-instruct”
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, trust_remote_code=True)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
# Streamlit app
def main():
st.title(“Prompt Inspector”)
# User input
task_prompt = st.text_area(“Enter the prompt for the prompt inspector’s task”, “”)
prompt = st.text_area(“Enter your prompt”, “”)
if st.button(“Inspect Prompt”):
if task_prompt and prompt:
# Preprocess the prompt
input_prompt = task_prompt + “n” + prompt
encoded_prompt = tokenizer.encode(input_prompt, add_special_tokens=False, return_tensors=”pt”)
# Generate prompt inspection
with st.spinner(“Inspecting prompt…”):
outputs = model.generate(encoded_prompt, max_length=128)
inspected_prompt = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
# Display inspected prompt
st.success(“Inspected Prompt:”)
st.code(inspected_prompt, language=”text”)
else:
st.warning(“Please enter the task prompt and the prompt to inspect.”)
if __name__ == “__main__”:
main()
“`
In this updated version, there is an additional text area input field where you can enter the prompt for the prompt inspector’s task. This task prompt will be combined with the user’s prompt, and the concatenated prompt will be used as input for the prompt inspection.
By providing a specific task prompt, you can guide the prompt inspector’s behavior to generate prompt inspections that are more tailored to the specified task or objective.
ou are using config.init_device=’cpu’, but you can also use config.init_device=”meta” with Composer + FSDP for fast initialization
You’re correct! I apologize for the oversight. When using the Hugging Face `transformers` library with Composer and FSDP, you can indeed leverage the `config.init_device=”meta”` setting for fast initialization. This configuration allows the model to automatically select the optimal device for initialization based on the available hardware.
To incorporate this setting into the script, you can modify the initialization of the model as follows:
“`python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, GPT2Config
model_name = “mosaicml/mpt-7b-instruct”
# Load the model configuration
model_config = GPT2Config.from_pretrained(model_name)
# Set the init_device to “meta”
model_config.init_device = “meta”
# Load the model and tokenizer with the updated configuration
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, config=model_config, trust_remote_code=True)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
“`
By setting `model_config.init_device = “meta”`, you allow the model to determine the optimal device for initialization based on the available hardware. This can result in faster initialization times, especially when using Composer with FSDP.
Please note that the availability and performance of `config.init_device=”meta”` may vary depending on the specific hardware setup and compatibility with the Hugging Face library. It’s always a good idea to refer to the Hugging Face documentation and experiment with different configurations to find the best performance for your specific use case.