Title: “(8) 3I/ATLAS SHIFTS! CONFIRMED BY SCIENTIFIC STUDY – YouTube”Video Transcript: “It’s crazy, but it’s true. There’s nothing for us to be concerned about. There’s nothing for us to be concerned about. There’s nothing for us to be concerned about. There’s nothing for us to be concerned about. According to them, there’s nothing to be concerned about. So, two scientists picked that data and based on that study, with that data, they applied a model. This is between scientists, very very reliable scientists. You can see this on astronomers.org. It’s the reading 174 37 and it’s crazy. 9 of October scientists. I strongly suggest the ones that are skeptical that check the curriculum of these two scientists. periodic changes in positional observations of three eyeatlas. Notice that they call it a comet but that will be always like that in the scientific community. Nobody will call another thing otherwise they will be you know what so I I’m not in their heads I don’t know if what they believe truly believe it is they are doing a job over the data actually it’s their job this Yuri Medvev and Sergey Pavlov are two scientists that work every single day in measuring orbits meteors cars, stuff like that, asteroids, everything around that. It’s their job. Now from this study what they concluded this says formulas and stuff basically that every 4 hours every four hours three Ilas change direction and every two hours three IATAS has a pulse of brightness. They made today another correction to fine-tune that period to the margin of error. So 4 hours plus – 2 hours to the movement and for the brightness those pulses of brightness 2 hours plus minus 1.33 hours. This doesn’t prove that it’s alien and doesn’t prove that it’s natural because it can fit the natural argument or the non-natural argument alien as well. And here we are about the truth. Irregardless, man, if at the end look at at my home we go back and forth. I’m always towards the alien side of it mostly. Sometimes I read something and it’s like the the landing on the moon. I feel like maybe it’s naturally I can be but then with the anomalies and I shift and then I see those images on from and no this is alien. So mainstream will pick the natural side of it and will tell something like to this uh if this is possible naturally because but to happen it to occur this uh bursts the these are bursts of energy. It has to to have a um binary nucleus because the rotation the real rotation that there are two studies at least about that is 16 hours 16ish so a full rotation of three iatas takes 16 hours it makes no sense so now you are saying me each four hours rotate no AI says because it’s both studies are correct because this one says something that implies that a nucleus, a binary nucleus. So it’s possible to have the 16 hours and the 4 hours at the same time. And what what about the twohour bursts of flight that is also possible to fit here because whatever ask AI man ask AI if you want to dig on that. I felt like being fooled by AI. But uh it’s true that I’m not as smart to read scientific uh stuff on by AI and understand perfectly. Oh yeah. Oh, it’s that that formula that two sentences formula. Ah, okay. Now I understand. I’m not a scientist. I’m just someone like you or even less. Okay. So I know what they say here and they put the formula here. It was found that these uh strange formula these strange formula values undergo variations with a statistical significant period of 4 hours. And then they say in a very simple language because it’s a correction today four or more or less two hours more a margin of error and two and margin of error 1.33 hours to the brightness the power spectrum of the light curve the method they applied it’s the bootstrap method it was obtained they applied a different method wishes uh in fact which uh something that AI says ah because the methods are different and the 16 hour is because one method but these guys were with a different method it I felt like I was being fooled but I’m not sure maybe AI was saying something logical and I’m not as smart and it’s the reality now the people that like to dig deeper on this the ones that are no mainstream is right It’s a comet. We’ll find easily an explanation for a natural thing to do this. The nucleus it’s a double nucleus. Whatever what they say the AI, not these guys. These guys don’t tell anything. These guys analyze data and said this has a period of four hours. Each four hours does these moves and uh each two hours gets a flash of light. Also the the AI saying about the 4hour spin it’s natural on the natural comets because of the gas that you know that the gas it’s what makes the the comets shift but the problem is that to have this kind of uh effect of outgassing that will be that sublimation periodically each four hours that would mean that we had a tail and they can’t explain that man. Then then you enter on the suppositions. Ah because this might be a different object because it’s interstellar. And we go again through the their fantasy again. We have our fantasies. It’s true the alien believers but they have their fantasies as well but their fantasies are very gray and very stereotype. They have all the same fantasies. It’s like having the same dream. Everyone, every night we have different dreams. We dream with this. We dream with that. Some of you think they will break apart. Some of you think they will send probes. Some of you think uh it’s a ghost alien probe. Some of you think loads of stuff. We are very much more creative than done. And that is good because with all that information we can you can build your own with your own head and pick things from them as well. Of course they they study data and the case of this Yuri Medvev and Sergey Pavlov it’s very reliable and very important. So periodic changes in positional observations of three I atlas. Now, we shouldn’t push to one or another narrative. We analyze this. It’s a weird thing. It’s very important. It’s very important because it’s something that uh it’s weird. every four hours. Do that without a tail because you saw on his images again, there’s no freaking tail,”Video Summary:
**Video Summary: “3I/ATLAS SHIFTS! CONFIRMED BY SCIENTIFIC STUDY”**
—
### **Core Claim**
The video discusses a new study by two Russian astronomers—**Yuri Medvedev** and **Sergey Pavlov**—which reports **periodic shifts in the motion and brightness of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS**. The study (referenced as “*Periodic changes in positional observations of 3I/ATLAS*”) allegedly identifies **two distinct repeating patterns**:
– **Positional shift:** every **4 hours ± 2 hours**
– **Brightness pulse:** every **2 hours ± 1.33 hours**
The host emphasizes that while the scientists label 3I/ATLAS as a *comet*, these repeating changes are statistically significant and unusual for typical cometary behavior.
—
### **Scientific Interpretation**
– The study suggests these observations **could result from a “binary nucleus”** — meaning the comet may consist of two gravitationally bound bodies rotating together.
– This dual-core model might reconcile the apparent **16-hour rotation period** found by other researchers with the new **4-hour modulation** (a harmonic effect of binary rotation).
– The **bootstrap statistical method** was reportedly used to confirm periodicity in both motion and brightness, indicating non-random variation.
—
### **Alternative Speculation**
The narrator oscillates between **natural** and **non-natural (alien probe)** interpretations:
– **Natural hypothesis:** Periodic gas outgassing could cause spin and brightness variation — though this would typically produce a visible tail, which 3I/ATLAS lacks.
– **Artificial hypothesis:** The rhythmic light pulses and directional changes could suggest controlled activity or propulsion.
He admits these findings **don’t prove either case** but notes that both camps (scientific and speculative) “have their fantasies.”
—
### **Tone and Meta-Commentary**
– The speaker mocks mainstream scientists for being rigidly “naturalist,” while acknowledging his own bias toward “alien explanations.”
– He concedes he is *not a scientist*, relying instead on secondary interpretations and AI tools to understand technical material.
– The recurring theme: **keep an open but skeptical mind** — the behavior is unusual, yet not necessarily proof of intelligent design.
—
### **Bottom Line**
A pair of astronomers reportedly found **repetitive 4-hour motion shifts and 2-hour brightness pulses** in 3I/ATLAS, potentially implying a **binary nucleus or periodic internal process**.
The host dramatizes it as evidence of a “shift,” while the underlying paper—if authentic—appears to describe a **statistical anomaly**, not a declaration of alien technology.