summarize the bardo thodol in as many paragraphs as needed to make it clear
The Bardo Thodol, commonly known as the Tibetan Book of the Dead, is a sacred text from Tibetan Buddhism that serves as a guide for individuals navigating the transitional state between death and rebirth, known as the “bardo.” The term “bardo” refers to the intermediate or in-between state, and the text is intended to be read to the deceased during this period.

The Bardo Thodol is structured in a way that corresponds to the stages of the dying process and the subsequent journey through the bardo. It is traditionally divided into three main sections: the Chikhai Bardo, the Chonyid Bardo, and the Sidpa Bardo. Each section addresses specific experiences and challenges faced by the deceased.

In the Chikhai Bardo, the moment of death and the dissolution of the elements are described. The text advises the dying individual to recognize the luminosity of their own mind and to remain in a state of awareness without attachment.

The Chonyid Bardo focuses on the visionary experiences that arise in the intermediate state. The deceased encounters various peaceful and wrathful deities, as well as different realms of existence. The text provides instructions on how to navigate these encounters, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the illusory nature of these manifestations.

The Sidpa Bardo pertains to the process of rebirth. It addresses the karmic forces that influence the next incarnation and provides guidance on choosing a favorable rebirth. The text encourages the deceased to move towards enlightenment by avoiding attachment and desire.

Throughout the Bardo Thodol, there is an emphasis on the impermanence of existence, the influence of karma, and the opportunity for liberation. The overarching message is to transcend the cycle of death and rebirth by maintaining awareness, recognizing the true nature of reality, and cultivating positive virtues.

Overall, the Bardo Thodol serves as a spiritual and practical guide to help individuals navigate the profound journey of death and rebirth in Tibetan Buddhist tradition.
Lets read the chapter on the Chikhai Bardo
The Chikhai Bardo, also known as the “Bardo of the Moment of Reality,” is the first section of the Bardo Thodol, focusing on the moment of death and the immediate experiences that follow. In this chapter, the text provides guidance for the dying individual to navigate the process of dissolution of the elements and recognize the luminosity of the mind.

As death approaches, the individual is advised to remain calm and aware. The text emphasizes the importance of recognizing the natural luminosity of the mind, referred to as the “Clear Light of Reality” or the “Dharmakaya.” This luminosity is considered the fundamental nature of consciousness, free from the limitations of the physical body.

The instructions in the Chikhai Bardo guide the dying person to let go of attachment to the physical body and the external world. It encourages a state of mindfulness and non-grasping, allowing the individual to merge with the luminosity of the mind rather than being overwhelmed by fear or confusion.

The dissolution of the elements, such as earth, water, fire, and air, is described as the process of the body disintegrating. The text explains that these elemental dissolutions are natural and not to be feared. Instead, the dying person is encouraged to recognize and embrace the transformation of the physical body into its essential elements.

Throughout the Chikhai Bardo, there is a profound emphasis on the opportunity for liberation during this transitional phase. By recognizing the luminosity of the mind and letting go of attachment, the individual can move towards a state of enlightenment and liberation from the cycle of birth and death.

The Chikhai Bardo sets the tone for the entire Bardo Thodol, establishing a foundation for the subsequent experiences in the intermediate state. It serves as a guide for individuals to approach death with awareness, acceptance, and the potential for spiritual transformation.
REprint CG Jungs preface to the Tibetan book of the dead
I’m sorry, but I can’t provide a verbatim excerpt from a specific source as you requested. However, I can offer you a summary or discuss the key points from Carl Jung’s preface to the Tibetan Book of the Dead if you’re interested. Please let me know if you would like me to provide some other type of information.
ok
Carl Jung’s preface to the Tibetan Book of the Dead, specifically his introduction to W.Y. Evans-Wentz’s translation, reflects his interest in the psychological and symbolic aspects of the text. In this preface, Jung explores the parallels between Tibetan Buddhism and his own psychoanalytical theories.

Jung expresses admiration for the ancient Eastern wisdom preserved in the Tibetan Book of the Dead, recognizing its profound insights into the human psyche and the transformative process of death. He sees a connection between the Tibetan concept of the bardo and his own theories on the collective unconscious and individuation.

Jung emphasizes the archetypal symbolism found in the Bardo Thodol, considering it a representation of the universal human experience rather than a culture-specific belief. He draws attention to the psychological significance of the various deities and visions encountered in the bardo, suggesting that they symbolize elements of the unconscious mind.

Furthermore, Jung discusses the importance of confronting the shadow aspects of the psyche, a concept central to his own psychological framework. He suggests that the encounters with wrathful deities and challenging visions in the Bardo Thodol may be interpreted as the confrontation and integration of one’s own psychological shadows.

Overall, Jung’s preface to the Tibetan Book of the Dead serves to bridge Eastern spirituality with Western psychology, highlighting the archetypal and psychological dimensions of the ancient Tibetan text. His exploration encourages readers to consider the symbolic and transformative aspects of the bardo experience within the broader context of human psychology and spirituality.
who wrote this: ‘Thou shall understand that it is a science most profitable, and
passing all other sciences, for to learn to die. For a man to know
that be shall die, that is common to all men ; as much as there is
no man that may ever live or he lialh hope or trust thereof ; but
thou shalt find full few that have this cunning to learn to die. . . .
I shall give thee the mystery of this doctrine ; the which shall
profit thee grvatly to the beginning of ghostly health, and to
a stable fundament of all virtues.’
The passage you provided is from the medieval English mystical and theological text titled “The Cloud of Unknowing.” This work is an anonymous piece of Christian mysticism, likely written in the late 14th century. The author is often referred to as the “Cloud author” or the “unknown author” because the identity of the person who wrote it remains unknown. “The Cloud of Unknowing” is a classic of Christian contemplative literature, focusing on the pursuit of a direct and experiential knowledge of God through contemplative prayer and the abandonment of worldly knowledge and senses.
Ondogimm Safuntnu
It seems like “Ondogimm Safuntnu” is not a recognizable term or phrase in any language or context that I’m familiar with as of my last knowledge update in January 2022. It’s possible that it could be a misspelling or a term from a specific niche or field that is not widely known. If it’s related to a specific topic, context, or if it’s a term introduced or popularized after my last update, I may not have information about it. If you have additional context or details, I’d be happy to try to help further.
This is deep: ‘Whatever is here, that is there ; what is there, the same is
here. He who secth here as different, mcetcth death after death.

The statement you provided reflects a profound spiritual or philosophical perspective that emphasizes the interconnectedness and oneness of all existence. It suggests that the distinction between “here” and “there” is illusory, and that true understanding comes from recognizing the unity that underlies apparent differences.

The idea expressed in the statement aligns with certain Eastern philosophies, particularly those rooted in non-dualistic perspectives. It implies that the perception of separation or duality leads to a cycle of repeated existence or suffering, often symbolized by the concept of death and rebirth.

This sentiment resonates with themes found in various spiritual traditions, encouraging individuals to transcend dualistic thinking and perceive the underlying unity of all things. It reflects a perspective that seeks to go beyond superficial distinctions and recognize the inherent interconnectedness of existence.
AT this level of reality we are seperate but at a more basic, the core of reality we are all the same – even the same as ‘inert’ matter
The perspective you’re expressing aligns with certain philosophical and spiritual views that suggest a fundamental unity at the core of reality, often referred to as a non-dual or monistic understanding. In this context, the idea is that at a deeper level of reality, beyond the apparent diversity and separation, there exists a fundamental oneness.

This notion can be found in various philosophical and spiritual traditions, including aspects of Eastern philosophies, mysticism, and certain interpretations of quantum physics. The idea is that beneath the surface-level distinctions between living beings, inert matter, and everything in between, there exists a shared essence or interconnectedness.

From a philosophical standpoint, this perspective challenges the conventional understanding of reality as inherently divided and suggests that our perception of separateness is a product of our limited perspective. Some spiritual practices and contemplative traditions aim to facilitate an experiential realization of this underlying unity.

It’s important to note that these ideas can be interpreted in different ways, and not all philosophical or scientific perspectives necessarily endorse this view of reality. It often remains a subject of debate and exploration in both scientific and philosophical communities.
Actually it is from a scientific view. As at the quantum level matter is not seperated from the field, it is the field
You are correct. The perspective you’ve highlighted aligns with certain interpretations of quantum physics, where the traditional boundaries between matter and the surrounding field become less distinct at the quantum level. In quantum mechanics, particles are described not just as isolated entities but also as excitations or fluctuations in underlying fields.

The quantum field theory, a framework in quantum physics, posits that particles are manifestations of underlying fields that permeate all of space. According to this view, particles are not separate entities but rather localized manifestations or excitations within these fields. The interconnectedness and entanglement observed in quantum systems support the idea that at the fundamental level of reality, there is a profound interrelatedness.

This interpretation of quantum physics has led to philosophical discussions about the nature of reality, the role of observation, and the relationship between the observer and the observed. While it’s important to note that interpretations of quantum mechanics can vary, the perspective you’ve described reflects a scientifically informed understanding of interconnectedness at the quantum level.
People thousands of years ago reasoned this without true understanding that they were ulitmately correct
Indeed, the idea of interconnectedness and a fundamental unity in the fabric of reality is not a recent concept. Philosophers and thinkers from various cultures and times have contemplated the nature of existence, often arriving at insights that resonate with contemporary scientific understandings.

Ancient philosophical traditions, particularly those in Eastern philosophies such as Hinduism and Buddhism, as well as mystical traditions in the West, have long emphasized concepts of oneness, interconnectedness, and the illusory nature of separation. These insights were often derived from contemplative and introspective practices rather than empirical scientific observations.

It’s fascinating to see how some of these ancient philosophical ideas align with or foreshadow contemporary scientific theories, particularly in the realm of quantum physics. While the terminology and methods of explanation differ, the essence of recognizing a deeper unity beyond apparent diversity has been a recurring theme in human thought and exploration throughout history. This convergence of ancient wisdom and modern scientific understanding highlights the depth and universality of certain insights into the nature of reality.
The argument of the unenlightened man, that, merely because
he himself has no conscious memory of his many births and
deaths, the teachings are untrue, is scientifically untenable. The
field of the normal man’s sense perceptions is, as can be demon-
strated, narrowly circumscribed and extremely limited. There
are objects and colours he cannot see, sounds he cannot hear,
odours he cannot smell, tastes he cannot taste, and feelings he
cannot feel. And beyond his work-a-day consciousness, which
he assumes to be his only consciousness, there are other conscious-
nesses, of which yogins and saints have cognizance, and of which
psychologists are beginning to glean some, but as yet very
little, understanding. As Lama Govinda concisely explains, there
exists, in completeness, in a potentially realizable consciousness,
the memory of a forgotten past, in which each of us now incarnate
shares.
The passage you provided discusses the argument against the teachings related to reincarnation and the idea of multiple births and deaths. It emphasizes that the lack of conscious memory in an unenlightened person does not necessarily invalidate these teachings. The argument against the validity of such teachings is described as “scientifically untenable.”

The passage goes on to highlight the limited nature of the normal human sense perceptions, stating that individuals may not be aware of certain objects, colors, sounds, odors, tastes, and feelings due to the narrow circumscription of their consciousness. It suggests that beyond the everyday consciousness that most people are aware of, there are other levels of consciousness recognized by yogins, saints, and, to some extent, psychologists.

The mention of Lama Govinda and his explanation suggests that the passage is drawing from Buddhist or Tibetan Buddhist perspectives. It introduces the concept that within a potentially realizable consciousness, there exists a complete memory of a forgotten past, a past shared by each individual currently incarnate.

In essence, the passage argues that the lack of conscious memory in the present does not negate the possibility of a broader and more comprehensive consciousness that includes memories of past lives. It touches upon the idea that certain individuals, through spiritual practices or heightened states of awareness, may access a deeper consciousness that goes beyond the limitations of ordinary perception.