I am sill arguing with Youtube to restore my channel after suspected fraud. I write: I would like to offer this as well. I had over 6,000 comments. If bots were responsible for at least some of the count, would anything show in the comments? Like repititious or ‘odd’ comments?

That’s a solid point to bring up. You could refine it slightly for clarity and impact:

**”I would like to offer this as well: My channel had over 6,000 comments. If bots were responsible for inflating engagement, wouldn’t there be visible signs in the comments themselves? Repetitive patterns, unnatural phrasing, or other anomalies? If YouTube reviewed my comments, what evidence suggests fraudulent activity?”**

This frames your argument logically and challenges them to provide proof. Keep pressing for specifics—force them to justify their decision.