check this
I can analyze the flowchart and the pseudocode from the image.
### **Flowchart Analysis:**
1. The decision point **B** determines two possible paths:
– If **Yes (True)** → Move to **C**
– If **No (False)** → Move to **D**
2. **If B → C**
– Decision point **H** determines:
– If **Yes (True)** → Move to **Z**
– If **No (False)** → No other path is indicated in the pseudocode (but logically stays in C).
3. **If B → D**
– Decision point **E** determines:
– If **Yes (True)** → Move to **I**
– If **No (False)** → Move to **F**
### **Pseudocode Verification:**
The given pseudocode:
“`plaintext
B?
if Yes then
C
if H? then
Z
endif
else
D
if E? then
I
else
F
endif
endif
“`
– This correctly represents the flowchart.
– The decision for **H** (under **C**) correctly leads to **Z**.
– The decision for **E** (under **D**) correctly leads to **I** if **Yes** or **F** if **No**.
### **Conclusion:**
✅ The pseudocode correctly matches the logic of the flowchart. No corrections are needed.
!
Looks good! Let me know if you need any refinements. 🚀
Assume that you have created a mechanical arm that can hold a pen. The arm can perform the following tasks:
Lower the pen to a piece of paper.
Raise the pen from the paper.
Move the pen 1 inch along a straight line. (If the pen is lowered, this action draws a 1-inch line from left to right; if the pen is raised, this action just repositions the pen 1 inch to the right.)
Turn 90 degrees to the right.
Draw a circle that is 1 inch in diameter.
Draw a structured flowchart or write structured pseudocode describing the logic that would cause the arm to draw or write the following. Have a fellow student act as the mechanical arm and carry out your instructions. Don’t reveal the desired outcome to your partner until the exercise is complete.
a. 1-inch square
b. 2-inch by 1-inch rectangle
c. string of three beads
d. short word (for example, cat)
e. four-digit number
Here’s a structured pseudocode for each drawing task. The mechanical arm follows a sequence of commands to complete each shape or pattern.
—
### **Pseudocode for Drawing Tasks**
#### **a. 1-inch Square**
“`plaintext
Lower Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Turn Right 90 degrees
Move Forward 1 inch
Turn Right 90 degrees
Move Forward 1 inch
Turn Right 90 degrees
Move Forward 1 inch
Turn Right 90 degrees
Raise Pen
“`
—
#### **b. 2-inch by 1-inch Rectangle**
“`plaintext
Lower Pen
Move Forward 2 inches
Turn Right 90 degrees
Move Forward 1 inch
Turn Right 90 degrees
Move Forward 2 inches
Turn Right 90 degrees
Move Forward 1 inch
Turn Right 90 degrees
Raise Pen
“`
—
#### **c. String of Three Beads (Three Circles)**
“`plaintext
Lower Pen
Draw Circle
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw Circle
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw Circle
Raise Pen
“`
—
#### **d. Short Word (“CAT”)**
“`plaintext
Lower Pen
Draw “C” (custom sequence of movements)
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw “A” (custom sequence of movements)
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw “T” (custom sequence of movements)
Raise Pen
“`
(Note: The letters require more complex instructions, breaking each into line segments.)
—
#### **e. Four-Digit Number (e.g., “2024”)**
“`plaintext
Lower Pen
Draw “2”
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw “0”
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw “2”
Raise Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Lower Pen
Draw “4”
Raise Pen
“`
(Each number follows a sequence of line movements to form its shape.)
—
### **Execution Instructions for a Partner**
1. Follow the steps precisely.
2. Do not assume what is being drawn—just execute the commands.
3. Only after completing the instructions, compare the outcome with the expected drawing.
This exercise demonstrates the importance of structured programming logic in robotics! 🤖✍️
WTF is this book asking? There is not instructions like this in the book. And this is question 4
It sounds like the book is asking you to create a **flowchart or structured pseudocode** that **instructs a mechanical arm to perform tasks without revealing the final outcome to the person executing them.** Essentially, it’s a way to practice breaking down complex tasks into precise, step-by-step instructions—just like programming.
If the book doesn’t provide specific instructions like these, it might expect you to infer the necessary commands based on the given mechanical arm capabilities.
Would you like me to adjust the response to be more in line with what you think the book is asking? Maybe something simpler?
Yes, but to make a C? Sure in pixel art. But how many instructions do they expect me to have to write out for this
Yeah, trying to draw a **C** with just these basic arm movements is a pain—it’s doable in **pixel art style** with straight lines, but if they expect a smooth curve, that’s a ton of tiny movements. If the book doesn’t specify how detailed to go, they probably just want you to **approximate** it using the given actions.
### **Simpler Approach for “C”**
Instead of worrying about curves, break it into three straight-line moves:
1. **Move right**
2. **Move down**
3. **Move left**
#### **Pseudocode for “C” in Pixel Art Style**
“`plaintext
Lower Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Raise Pen
Turn Right 90 degrees
Lower Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Raise Pen
Turn Right 90 degrees
Lower Pen
Move Forward 1 inch
Raise Pen
“`
That would create a blocky “C.” If they want **smooth curves**, they’d have to give you **arc or diagonal movement commands**, which they don’t.
If you’re supposed to **hand this off to a partner** without them knowing what it makes, the challenge is just to see how well they can follow your structured instructions.
Want me to simplify any other parts?
I don’t jhave a partner so I am just going to skip this part of the q
That makes sense. If you don’t have a partner, there’s no point in doing the blind execution part. Just focus on writing structured steps for the mechanical arm. If the book isn’t clear on how detailed they expect you to be, it’s probably fine to keep it simple and just approximate shapes using straight lines and right angles.
If you need help with anything else in the question, just let me know!