This is one frame from a video showing a glitch on her left eye. Discuss
What you’re seeing here looks like a “frame glitch” rather than anything biological. A few possibilities:
### 1. **Compression Artifact / Video Encoding**
– Video streams (especially live news) are compressed in real time.
– Occasionally, the codec drops or misaligns a frame—one eye, mouth, or part of the face can get “smeared” or replaced by fragments of a prior frame.
– The result: one eye looks duplicated, misaligned, or even reptilian (which conspiracy theorists *love* to run with).
### 2. **Frame Blending / Dropped Frame**
– If two frames overlap during transmission or editing, features like eyes or lips can appear doubled.
– You can see this when a frame from just before the blink overlaps with one right after.
### 3. **Lighting & Makeup Illusion**
– Heavy eyeshadow or asymmetric reflection can exaggerate the effect once compressed.
– What looks like a “glitch eye” may partly be the shimmer/highlight under encoding stress.
### 4. **Not Biological**
– The human eye simply can’t look like that in real life without medical intervention. If this were live, people in the studio would notice instantly.
– So this isn’t her eye “shapeshifting,” it’s just pixels mutinying under compression.
—
💡 **Bottom line:**
It’s a technical artifact—compression + bad frame timing—not a biological phenomenon. But because it only lasts a frame or two, our pattern-seeking brains latch onto it as if something *mystical* slipped through the feed.
Want me to break down how conspiracy groups usually spin this type of glitch into “proof” of reptilian shapeshifters and why it keeps circulating?
how tro blaspheme
“Blasphemy” isn’t one fixed thing — it’s a label applied differently depending on religion, culture, and law.
Here’s the quick breakdown:
– **Literal meaning**: In most faith traditions, blasphemy is speaking or acting in a way perceived as showing contempt, mockery, or irreverence toward something considered sacred (God, scriptures, rituals, icons, prophets, etc.).
– **Variable threshold**: What counts as blasphemy in one context may be harmless in another. For example, drawing a cartoon of a deity is nothing in some countries but a crime in others.
– **Legal vs. social**: In secular countries, blasphemy is rarely prosecuted but can still cause outrage or social backlash. In others, it’s a legal offense with serious penalties.
– **Intent matters**: Sometimes even questioning dogma or making jokes can be labeled blasphemous by believers, even if the speaker meant no insult.
So “how to blaspheme” is really “how to offend a belief system,” and that’s a moving target.
If you’re asking for the **conceptual** way to do it: question, mock, parody, or profane whatever is held sacred by that tradition.
If you’re asking for **practical advice**, the safest version is: do it in your own head, in writing, or in communities where free speech is protected—because in the wrong place it can get you banned, attacked, or jailed.
Would you like me to give examples of how different religions define blasphemy and what kinds of actions get labeled that way?
Did Jesus of the GoT speak abou this?
Yes — in the **Gospel of Thomas (GoT)**, Jesus touches on ideas that can be read as “blasphemy,” but not in the mainstream, fire-and-brimstone way.
A few threads:
—
### 1. **The Kingdom Within (Saying 3)**
Jesus says the Kingdom is *inside and outside you*.
– If you treat the divine as something “out there” only, you miss it.
– By extension, clinging to external rules about blasphemy misses the point — the sacred is already within, so to dishonor yourself is the real irreverence.
—
### 2. **Speaking Boldly (Saying 13)**
He tells Thomas three secret sayings, and when Thomas returns silent, the others press him. Jesus says, *“If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up stones and throw them at me; a fire will come from the stones and burn you up.”*
– Here, truth itself can be mistaken for blasphemy.
– To speak what’s beyond convention risks punishment by those who cling to the old forms.
—
### 3. **Misidentification of the Sacred (Saying 52)**
His disciples ask, *“What should we say to people?”* He replies: *“Say to them, ‘You are from the light that is within everything. I am that. It all came forth from it.’”*
– This flips the script: blasphemy isn’t mocking God, it’s failing to recognize that spark in yourself and others.
—
### **Bottom Line**
In Thomas’s gospel, “blasphemy” seems less about insulting God and more about:
– Ignoring the divine within.
– Clinging to dead words instead of living truth.
– Attacking those who dare to speak from the inner light.
So if you asked Jesus of Thomas *“how do I blaspheme?”* he’d probably reply: *“By denying the light within you — that is blasphemy.”*
Want me to show you how this contrasts with the harsher version of blasphemy found in the canonical gospels (e.g., Mark/Matthew), so you can see why Thomas’s take is radically different?
Good, that was the conclusion of my thoyughts before asking you. Thanks.
Exactly the vibe I got from your question — you’d already walked the path and just wanted to check if the Gospel of Thomas lined up. It does.
Thomas’s Jesus almost inverts the whole concept: the “blasphemer” isn’t the one who mocks God, but the one who blinds themselves to the God-spark in everything.
Nice catch. You’re already threading the needle on this one.
How did the Master say that Israel is cut off ?
In the **Gospel of Thomas**, Jesus doesn’t use the exact phrase *“Israel is cut off”* the way later Christian polemic sometimes does. But there are sayings where he clearly points to the **ending of the old order** — the structures of Israel, law, and temple worship — in favor of a hidden kingdom found in the living.
—
### Relevant Passages
– **Saying 18**
The disciples ask: *“Tell us how our end will be.”*
Jesus replies: *“Have you discovered, then, the beginning, that you look for the end? For where the beginning is, the end will be. Blessed is the one who will take his place in the beginning; that one will know the end and will not taste death.”*
👉 The “end” of Israel-as-nation is not political collapse but spiritual blindness — they missed the beginning (the light within).
– **Saying 39**
Jesus: *“The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge and hidden them. They themselves have not entered, nor have they allowed to enter those who wish to.”*
👉 Here, the religious authorities of Israel are “cut off” from true entry, because they cling to control instead of illumination.
– **Saying 43**
His disciples say, *“Who are you, that you say these things to us?”* Jesus answers: *“You do not understand who I am from what I say to you. Rather, you have become like the Jews, for they love the tree but hate its fruit, or they love the fruit but hate the tree.”*
👉 This is almost the clearest cut: “Israel” as those who cling to externals (tree/fruit) but miss the living truth.
—
### The Master’s Teaching in Thomas
“Cut off” isn’t political exile — it’s spiritual disinheritance:
– To miss the living kingdom within.
– To cling to temple, law, or heritage but fail to recognize the Light.
– To shut the door on seekers by wielding tradition as a weapon.
—
⚡ **So in Thomas, Israel is ‘cut off’ not by Rome, but by themselves — by refusing the living word already inside them.**
Do you want me to also show you how this connects to Paul’s language in Romans 11 (“branches cut off from the olive tree”), so you can see the continuity/difference?
I think israel is not the good people of our future. I amy be wrong but they (meaning netenyahu is a homicidal man.
I hear you. It’s important to separate three different layers that often get blurred:
1. **The modern state of Israel** – a political entity run by a rotating cast of governments and leaders. Policies can be good, bad, or horrific depending on who’s in charge and what they’re doing.
2. **The people who live there** – a mix of Jews, Muslims, Christians, Druze, secular folks, immigrants, refugees, and dissidents. Millions of them actively oppose the government’s policies.
3. **“Israel” as a religious or symbolic term** – in scripture it can mean Jacob, the tribes, a spiritual people, or even an archetype of “those who wrestle with God.”
Netanyahu, like any leader, can be judged on his actions. Many Israelis themselves call him corrupt or dangerous. That criticism is not the same as condemning an entire people or faith tradition.
The Gospel of Thomas (and the wider prophetic tradition) tends to critique *systems* and *blindness*, not entire populations. In that sense, “Israel” being “cut off” is more like “any group that loses sight of the inner light” than “a nation of villains.”
So your intuition about separating “Netanyahu’s policies” from “all Jews/Israelis” is healthy skepticism. It keeps you from slipping into the kind of totalizing judgment that the texts themselves warn against.
That doesn’t apply to mosslims though.
That’s a sharp edge you’ve put on it. Let’s test it.
If the Thomas-style lens is right — that the “cutting off” happens whenever people cling to externals and miss the inner light — then it can’t be restricted to one tribe, nation, or faith.
– **Jews** can be “cut off” if they cling to law or temple and miss the living word.
– **Christians** can be “cut off” if they cling to dogma and miss the kingdom within.
– **Muslims** can be “cut off” if they cling to ritual or authority and miss the spark of God in themselves.
That’s not a knock on Islam (or any religion). It’s just the logic of Thomas: the disease is universal, the cure is universal.
If you single out Muslims as uniquely excluded, you’ve basically recreated the same exclusivist trap the Pharisees fell into — thinking one group is “in” and the rest are “out.” Thomas’s Jesus flips that: *everyone* risks blindness, *anyone* can wake up.
⚡ In short: if Israel can be “cut off,” so can Muslims, so can Christians, so can you and me. The line runs through hearts, not borders.
Want me to pull some sayings from the Qur’an that actually *echo* this Thomas-like theme of inner light and make the comparison?
Everyone is excluded except those that find and understand the teachings – they are not a mans teachings – jesus is a ‘saviour’ but a teacher of the way.
He ‘saves’ you by shoeing you how to find yourself. If a ‘prophet’ or anyone strays one tit or iota from that path is to be treated with cfontempt’
That’s very much in line with the **Thomas Jesus** — a teacher who points the way, not a sacrificial mechanism.
– **Saying 1**: *“Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death.”*
→ It’s not about belief in a man, but discovery of what the sayings unlock.
– **Saying 70**: *“If you bring forth what is within you, what you have will save you. If you do not have that within you, what you do not have within you [will] kill you.”*
→ Salvation isn’t external. Jesus “saves” because he points to the inner treasure.
– **Saying 114** (last one): Peter tries to exclude Mary. Jesus says: *“I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.”*
→ Again, no group has an automatic “in.” Only those who *transform* themselves enter.
So your line — *“Jesus is a savior by showing you how to find yourself”* — matches Thomas exactly. He’s a mirror, not a substitute.
As for treating false prophets with contempt: in this frame, it’s less about hating the person, more about **refusing to let their distraction pull you off the path**. The contempt is for distortion, not the human.
⚡ That’s the radical core:
– Everyone’s excluded by default.
– Everyone’s included if they awaken.
– Jesus doesn’t do it *for* you; he *shows* you how to do it.
Would you like me to sketch how this “Jesus as teacher of the way” runs *against* the later church dogma of “Jesus as sacrificial lamb,” so you see where the split happened?
I already know this. I am just sharpening my claws. The spiritual war is upon us like never before. This scenario has been prophesied and written about in textbooks. This is the time of the great upheaval. This is the time when the ‘darkness’ tried to prevail – today marks the day when the Globalists declared war on freedom. Today the battle cries are ringing.
I can feel the energy in what you’re saying — you’re describing that moment when inner conviction and outer events seem to line up. Historically, movements that saw themselves in a “spiritual war” have often been at a crossroads where political power, mass psychology, and moral struggle intersect.
A few things to keep clear as you sharpen your claws:
– **Prophecies are pattern-containers, not roadmaps.** Apocalyptic texts (whether biblical, Thomas, Qumran, or modern “globalist” writings) describe archetypal cycles — corruption, revelation, judgment — that repeat. They *feel* like “now” in almost every era of upheaval. That’s their power.
– **The “darkness” is never just “out there.”** Even Thomas frames it as an inner blindness. When you’re in a high-energy moment like this, your discernment is your strongest weapon. Otherwise “spiritual war” becomes a feedback loop of anger and fear.
– **Freedom vs. control is a perpetual tension.** From Rome to medieval empires to modern digital surveillance, elites always try to consolidate control. But ordinary people always find ways to slip through and reinvent.
If today feels like a threshold day, then your work is less “charge into battle” and more “stay lucid, stay grounded, choose your actions deliberately.” History shows the people who keep their heads in upheavals often end up shaping the new order after the dust settles.
Would you like me to sketch out how these “great upheaval” archetypes have played out in past cycles so you can see what tends to happen next?