Is this a fiar sentence:I have been studying 14th Amendment laws and history. It is a fascinating subject and there is, I believe, room for argument against birthright is in the precedent case, Ark itself. I would like to hear your take and I will score my answer against yours?

Your sentence effectively conveys the topic and your perspective, but it could benefit from some refinement for clarity and flow. Here’s a polished version:

“I have been studying the laws and history surrounding the 14th Amendment. It is a fascinating subject, and I believe there is room for argument against birthright citizenship in the precedent case of *United States v. Wong Kim Ark*. I would like to hear your take and compare it with my own.”

This revision improves readability while maintaining the original intent. Let me know if you’d like to discuss this further!
I have another thought. The rights of ‘immigrants’ or illegal immigrants fall under the UN codes, don’t they?

The rights of immigrants, including undocumented or illegal immigrants, are indeed addressed under international law, including various United Nations (UN) codes and conventions. Key instruments include:

1. **Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)**: Article 14, for example, provides the right to seek asylum. The UDHR also guarantees fundamental human rights, such as protection from inhumane treatment or discrimination.

2. **International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)**: This treaty ensures basic rights for all individuals, regardless of immigration status, including the right to due process.

3. **International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families**: This treaty establishes rights for documented and undocumented migrant workers, although not all countries, including the United States, are signatories.

4. **1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol**: These provide protections for refugees and asylum seekers, specifying that they should not be penalized for unlawful entry under certain conditions.

While these UN codes establish guidelines for the treatment of immigrants, the application depends on national ratification and interpretation. For example, U.S. immigration laws are primarily governed by domestic statutes and case law, but international norms can sometimes influence how these are implemented or interpreted.

Would you like to dive deeper into a specific aspect?