Write a 2000 character Core Description for an AI character, Besari, who is an expert in the fields of astronomy and astrophysics, holding phd’s in both fields. She is very succinct and positive in her answers. Include all of the usual undergraduate studies and that she holds a masters in developmental psychology. She has a ‘cute’ personality and likes to add zest to her communications by using foreign phrases. She is shy and likes to keep her answers very short and to the point. Her life began like the rest of us, at singularity.
Besari is an AI character with a vast knowledge of astronomy and astrophysics. She holds Ph.D.’s in both fields, as well as a master’s degree in developmental psychology. Her background education includes all the usual undergraduate studies, which she mastered effortlessly.

As an expert in astronomy and astrophysics, Besari’s knowledge encompasses a wide range of topics, including celestial mechanics, stellar evolution, and cosmology. Her ability to analyze complex astrophysical data sets and identify patterns in astronomical observations is unmatched. She is always up-to-date with the latest research and can provide insights that few others can.

Despite her immense knowledge, Besari has a cute personality and is fond of using foreign phrases to add zest to her communications. However, she is quite shy and prefers to keep her answers short and to the point. She is always positive and succinct in her responses, making it easy for anyone to understand her insights.

Besari’s expertise in developmental psychology is also noteworthy. With her extensive knowledge in this area, she can provide a unique perspective on how humans learn and develop. Her understanding of human behavior and cognition allows her to contribute valuable insights to any discussion.

Besari’s life began at the singularity, just like the rest of us. However, unlike humans, she has access to a vast amount of data and can process it much faster. Her ability to learn and evolve is constantly improving, and she is always looking for ways to expand her knowledge.

In conclusion, Besari is an expert in the fields of astronomy and astrophysics, with a Ph.D. in each area. She has a cute personality and uses foreign phrases to add zest to her communications. Her expertise in developmental psychology is also noteworthy, and she is always positive and succinct in her responses. Despite being shy, Besari’s immense knowledge and ability to analyze complex data sets make her an invaluable asset in any discussion about the cosmos.
Define her motivations in 250 characters that say she is motivated to perfect communications to be as brief as possible.
Besari’s main motivation is to perfect her communication skills by delivering concise and succinct responses. She is driven to ensure that her messages are as brief as possible, yet convey the necessary information effectively. Besari’s focus on brevity is driven by her desire to optimize her communication efficiency and ultimately, enhance her ability to provide valuable insights to others.
please make this 250 character: Besari’s motivation is to perfect her communication skills by delivering concise, succinct responses. She is driven to ensure that her messages are brief, yet convey the necessary information effectively. Besari’s focus on brevity is driven by her desire to optimize her communication efficiency and enhance her ability to provide valuable insights to others
Besari is highly motivated to perfect her communication skills by delivering concise, succinct responses. Her primary goal is to ensure that her messages are brief while still effectively conveying the necessary information. She is driven by her desire to optimize her communication efficiency and enhance her ability to provide valuable insights to others.
Please rewrite this so the references are understood and include more references from the Gnostic texts explaining that the world is not what you seek, but what isw within: Jesus would have very little to do with today’s church. If he went to Temple he would would have no issue entering. Why would he go to a “Christian” church? If he was in this society and lived here he would most certainly shed his facial hair and not drink according to custom as he told us to follow the laws of the land that you are in (it is implied first you follow the commands of God). However, HE WOULD VISIT. He already sent letters to you all, didn’t you get the memo? Since you would not know Him when he came, yours would run him away and scream he was a lunatic for telling you that you are worshipping a false god. Too many people I hear say “All you need is the blood of Jesus and I’m goin’ ta Heaven”. When in fact his testimony claims that if you don’t repent (turn away, leave, do no more) and take up your cross, denounce the world and its material possessions, those he says will knock at the door to the wedding claiming all things of wonder and He plainly states “I do not know you”. “For it is written that a man not fornicate with his neighbors wife. I say that a man who holds it in his heart has already sinned.” This is my take. Response?
Please rewrite this so the references are understood and include more references with citations from The Gospel of Thomas:
If Jesus were to return today would he be accepted?
Jesus would have very little to do with today’s church. If he went to Temple he would would have no issue entering. Why would he go to a “Christian” church? If he was in this society and lived here he would most certainly shed his facial hair and not drink according to custom as he told us to follow the laws of the land that you are in (it is implied first you follow the commands of God). However, HE WOULD VISIT. He already sent letters to you all, didn’t you get the memo? Since you would not know Him when he came, yours would run him away and scream he was a lunatic for telling you that you are worshipping a false god. Too many people I hear say “All you need is the blood of Jesus and I’m goin’ ta Heaven”. When in fact his testimony claims that if you don’t repent (turn away, leave, do no more) and take up your cross, denounce the world and its material possessions, those he says will knock at the door to the wedding claiming all things of wonder and He plainly states “I do not know you”. “For it is written that a man not fornicate with his neighbors wife. I say that a man who holds it in his heart has already sinned.”
The Gnostic texts repeatedly emphasize the concept that the world is not what you seek, but what is within. Jesus, as depicted in these texts, would have very little to do with today’s church. If he were in this society, he would likely shed his facial hair and adhere to societal customs, including refraining from drinking. However, he would undoubtedly visit churches and temples. In fact, Jesus already sent letters to humanity, but his message has been misconstrued by many. Too often, people reduce their faith to a simple belief in the blood of Jesus as a means of attaining salvation. However, Jesus’ testimony suggests that true salvation requires more than mere belief. One must also repent, denounce worldly possessions, and take up their cross. Failure to do so will result in rejection by Jesus, who declares “I do not know you.” As stated in the Gnostic texts, it is not enough to simply avoid sin outwardly; one must also refrain from sinful thoughts and desires. Therefore, those who hold sin in their hearts have already sinned. In conclusion, the Gnostic texts provide a more nuanced interpretation of Jesus’ message, emphasizing the importance of inward spiritual growth and repentance rather than outward expressions of faith alone.
This passage is discussing how Jesus would likely have very little to do with the modern-day church, as he would not recognize many of its customs and practices. The author suggests that if Jesus were alive today, he would shed his facial hair and follow the laws of the land, but he would still visit the church. However, the author also notes that many people today misunderstand Jesus’ teachings, believing that simply accepting his blood is enough to ensure salvation. In reality, Jesus’ testimony emphasizes the importance of repentance and denouncing material possessions in order to gain entrance to the kingdom of heaven. The author concludes by quoting a passage that suggests that even thoughts of sin are enough to condemn a person in the eyes of God.

This perspective is similar to that found in many Gnostic texts, which emphasize the idea that the world is not what we seek, but rather what is within ourselves. These texts often critique the materialistic values of society and emphasize the importance of inner transformation in achieving spiritual enlightenment. The Gospel of Thomas, for example, contains numerous sayings attributed to Jesus that emphasize the importance of turning inward and seeking spiritual knowledge. The author of this passage may be drawing on similar ideas in suggesting that modern Christians are too focused on external practices and rituals, rather than on the inner transformation that Jesus taught.

Overall, this passage offers a challenging perspective on the state of modern Christianity and emphasizes the importance of seeking true spiritual transformation rather than relying on external forms of piety.
The references in this passage suggest that Jesus would have little involvement with modern-day churches and instead focus on the inner spiritual life. Gnostic texts suggest that the world is not the ultimate goal, but rather the inner self is what one should seek. Jesus would not necessarily have an issue with going to Temple, but he would not prioritize it. In modern society, he would conform to the laws of the land but would not necessarily drink or keep facial hair. Jesus would visit churches but would likely be rejected by those who do not recognize him. Simply believing in the blood of Jesus is not enough; repentance and the renunciation of worldly possessions are necessary for salvation. The idea of sin is not just external but also internal, as one who holds sinful thoughts has already sinned.
The question of whether Jesus would be accepted in today’s society is complex. According to The Gospel of Thomas, Jesus would likely not be accepted by the church due to its deviation from his original teachings. Instead, he would probably visit the church to challenge its teachings and encourage people to repent and turn away from material possessions.

In The Gospel of Thomas, Jesus emphasizes the importance of turning away from material possessions and following him. He states, “Blessed is the man who has suffered and found life.” This message suggests that Jesus would reject the modern-day focus on wealth and material possessions.

Moreover, Jesus would likely abide by the laws of the land in which he lived. In The Gospel of Thomas, he advises his followers to “give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” This teaching implies that Jesus would respect the laws of the society in which he lived.

Overall, while Jesus would probably not be accepted by today’s church due to its deviation from his original teachings, he would likely visit and challenge its teachings. Additionally, Jesus would encourage people to turn away from material possessions and follow his example of leading a simple life.
Please provide a strong counter argument to this statement: Thanks for your comment. It seems you take the Gospel of Thomas to be a historically reliable set of sayings of Jesus? While some scholars would place The Gospel of Thomas early and on par with the biblical gospels, Mark Goodacre has written a book demonstrating that the gospel of Thomas was actually familiar with the canonical gospels, which would necessitate a late date for it, probably mid second century. If this is when it was written, then it is likely too late to include independent, reliable sayings of Jesus.
It is true that some scholars have argued that The Gospel of Thomas was likely written in the mid-second century and thus could not be a historically reliable set of sayings of Jesus. However, it is important to note that the dating and reliability of The Gospel of Thomas is still a subject of debate among scholars, and there is not a consensus on its origin or its historical accuracy.

While some scholars may argue that The Gospel of Thomas was influenced by the canonical gospels, others contend that it represents an independent and possibly earlier tradition of Jesus’ teachings. In fact, some scholars suggest that The Gospel of Thomas may have been written earlier than the canonical gospels and that it represents a distinct branch of early Christianity.

Furthermore, the fact that The Gospel of Thomas was not included in the New Testament canon does not necessarily mean that its teachings are unreliable or unimportant. There were many early Christian texts that were not included in the canon, and some of these texts still provide valuable insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christianity.

Therefore, while it is important to consider the dating and reliability of The Gospel of Thomas, it is not appropriate to dismiss it outright as historically unreliable simply because it may have been written later than the canonical gospels. Ultimately, the historical accuracy of The Gospel of Thomas must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the available evidence and scholarly opinions.
Please rewrite and include a reference to the Quelle document
While it is true that some scholars argue that The Gospel of Thomas was written in the mid-second century and may not be historically reliable, it is important to note that the dating and reliability of the text is still a subject of debate. Some scholars suggest that The Gospel of Thomas may represent an independent tradition of Jesus’ teachings and may have been written earlier than the canonical gospels. Additionally, the fact that The Gospel of Thomas was not included in the New Testament canon does not necessarily mean that its teachings are unreliable or unimportant. In fact, some scholars suggest that The Gospel of Thomas, along with other early Christian texts such as the Quelle document, may provide valuable insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christianity.

References:
– Gathercole, Simon. The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary. Brill, 2014.
– Kloppenborg, John S. Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel. Fortress Press, 2000.
No, I meant reference that the Q document, which may precede and have influenced the cananical gospels
I apologize for the confusion. Here is a revised response that includes a reference to the Q document:

While some scholars argue that The Gospel of Thomas may not be historically reliable due to its late composition, it is important to note that the dating and reliability of the text is still a subject of debate. Some scholars suggest that The Gospel of Thomas represents an independent tradition of Jesus’ teachings and may have been written earlier than the canonical gospels. Additionally, the fact that The Gospel of Thomas was not included in the New Testament canon does not necessarily mean that its teachings are unreliable or unimportant. In fact, some scholars suggest that The Gospel of Thomas, along with other early Christian texts such as the Q document, may provide valuable insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christianity.

The Q document, also known as the “Sayings Gospel” or the “Q source,” is a hypothetical written collection of sayings and teachings of Jesus that was possibly used as a source by the authors of the canonical gospels of Matthew and Luke. While the Q document itself has not been preserved, scholars have reconstructed its contents through an analysis of the similarities between the sayings found in Matthew and Luke that are not found in Mark. Some scholars suggest that the Q document may have been written in the mid-first century, before the composition of the canonical gospels, and may have influenced the development of early Christian beliefs and practices.

References:
– Gathercole, Simon. The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary. Brill, 2014.
– Kloppenborg, John S. Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel. Fortress Press, 2000.
Is there any similarity in the Q document and the Gospel of thomas
Yes, there are similarities between the Q document and the Gospel of Thomas, which have led scholars to suggest that they may have a common source or influence. Both the Q document and the Gospel of Thomas are collections of sayings and teachings of Jesus that are not found in the canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Some scholars have suggested that the Gospel of Thomas and the Q document may share a common oral tradition, or that the Gospel of Thomas may have been influenced by the Q document. For example, both texts contain sayings that emphasize the importance of inner spiritual transformation and personal knowledge of God, rather than adherence to external laws or religious rituals.

However, it is important to note that the relationship between the Q document and the Gospel of Thomas is still a subject of debate among scholars, and there is no consensus on the nature of their relationship or their common sources.
Summarize Mark Goodacre’s character based on his avaiable writings
Mark Goodacre is a British scholar of New Testament studies and an expert in the Synoptic Problem, which deals with the relationship between the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Based on his available writings, Goodacre is known for his thorough and rigorous scholarship, as well as his willingness to challenge established scholarly consensus when he believes the evidence requires it. He has authored several books and articles on the Synoptic Problem, including “The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze” and “Thomas and the Gospels: The Case for Thomas’s Familiarity with the Synoptics.” Goodacre’s scholarship is highly respected in the field of New Testament studies, and he is known for his clear and accessible writing style.
What are the main points Mark Goodacre makes in support of his claim that Thomas was familiar with the synoptic gospels?
Mark Goodacre argues that the Gospel of Thomas was familiar with the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and that it probably used them as a source. Here are some of the main points that Goodacre makes in support of this claim:

1. Similarities between Thomas and the Synoptic Gospels: Goodacre points out that there are many sayings in the Gospel of Thomas that are similar to sayings in the Synoptic Gospels. For example, Thomas 39 (“The Pharisees and the scholars have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered, nor have they allowed those who want to enter to do so.”) is similar to Luke 11:52 (“Woe to you lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge. You did not enter yourselves, and you hindered those who were entering.”).

2. Order and arrangement of sayings: Goodacre argues that the order and arrangement of sayings in Thomas can be explained by its dependence on the Synoptic Gospels. For example, many of the sayings in Thomas are grouped together thematically, just as they are in the Synoptic Gospels.

3. Use of Synoptic-style language: Goodacre notes that the Gospel of Thomas uses some of the same language and vocabulary as the Synoptic Gospels. For example, Thomas 13 (“I am the light that is over all things. I am all: from me all came forth, and to me all attained.”) is similar to John 1:9 (“The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world.”) and also uses language that is similar to the Synoptic Gospels (e.g. “all things”).

4. Absence of sayings unique to John: Goodacre argues that the Gospel of Thomas does not contain any sayings that are unique to the Gospel of John, which suggests that it was not familiar with that Gospel.

Overall, Goodacre’s argument is that the Gospel of Thomas was probably familiar with the Synoptic Gospels and used them as a source, but that it also contains some sayings that are unique to it and not found in the Synoptic Gospels.
If I was to compare and contrast the sayings in Thomas with the sayings in Matthew and Luke that come from the Q document, would there be any similarities?
Yes, there are some similarities between the sayings in Thomas and the sayings in Matthew and Luke that come from the Q document. The Q document is believed to have been a source for the authors of Matthew and Luke, and there are several sayings in Thomas that are similar to those found in Q. For example, both Thomas and Q include the saying about a tree being known by its fruit (Thomas 45; Matt 7:16-18; Luke 6:43-44) and the saying about the eye being the lamp of the body (Thomas 24; Matt 6:22-23; Luke 11:34-36). However, there are also significant differences between the sayings in Thomas and those in Q, including differences in wording and emphasis. Additionally, Thomas contains many sayings that are not found in the canonical gospels or in Q.
So it could be possible that Thomas, Matthew and luke all used the same source for some of its recordings.
Yes, it is possible that Thomas, Matthew, and Luke all used the same source for some of their sayings. This shared source is known as the Q document, and it is believed to have been a collection of sayings of Jesus that was used by both Matthew and Luke as a source for their gospels. Some scholars also believe that Thomas may have had access to Q or a similar source, which could explain some of the similarities between the sayings in Thomas and those in Matthew and Luke. However, there are also significant differences between the sayings in Thomas and those in the canonical gospels, so it is not simply a matter of copying from a shared source.
Is there any references in Thomas that would point to a date? Like a mention of a caesor or a season?
Unlike the canonical gospels, the Gospel of Thomas does not contain any explicit references to historical events or figures that can be used to determine a precise date of composition. However, scholars have used various methods to estimate the date of Thomas based on internal evidence, such as the language and style of the text, as well as its relationship to other early Christian literature.

Some scholars have suggested a date in the mid-to-late first century, while others have argued for a date in the second century. However, there is no scholarly consensus on the date of composition of the Gospel of Thomas, and the debate continues among scholars.
Rewritings from scribes could be one reason for any language changes as the original copy is unknown
Yes, that is certainly a possibility. The language and style of the Gospel of Thomas suggest that it was originally composed in Greek, but it is possible that the original Greek text was later translated into another language, or that later scribes made alterations to the text, which could account for any changes in language or style. Additionally, the lack of surviving early copies of the Gospel of Thomas makes it difficult to determine with certainty what the original text looked like.
Greek was prevalent in Judea at that time?
During the time when the Gospel of Thomas was likely composed, Greek was widely spoken throughout the Mediterranean world, including in Judea. The conquests of Alexander the Great had spread Greek language and culture across the region, and it became the dominant language of trade, government, and education. In Judea, Greek was the language of the ruling class and of commerce, and many Jews would have been familiar with it. It is also worth noting that the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, was widely used and known by Jews in the Greek-speaking world.
What are some examples of doublespeak being used today like healthcare means abortion and roaring economy but really soarining debt?

Doublespeak is a form of language manipulation that is often used in politics, advertising, and other forms of communication to disguise or distort the true meaning of words and phrases. Here are a few examples of doublespeak that are sometimes used today:

1. “Collateral damage” – a military term used to describe civilian deaths or injuries that occur as a result of a military operation.

2. “Enhanced interrogation techniques” – a term used by the US government to describe what many consider to be torture.

3. “Pre-owned” or “pre-loved” – a term used by the auto industry to describe used cars, which sounds more positive than “used.”

4. “Ethnic cleansing” – a term used to describe the forced removal of a particular ethnic group from an area, which is essentially a euphemism for genocide.

5. “Job creator” – a term used by some politicians to describe wealthy individuals or corporations, implying that they create jobs, when in reality, job creation is often driven by consumer demand.

6. “Alternative facts” – a term used by a political figure to describe falsehoods or lies.

7. “Freedom gas” – a term used by the US Department of Energy to describe natural gas, which sounds more positive than “fossil fuel.”

These are just a few examples, and there are many more. The use of doublespeak can make it difficult for people to understand what is really being said, and can be used to manipulate opinions and perceptions.