heres a difficult problem for me to math out. From the earth zoom out to be able to fill your view and take in the edges of the univers, so to take in its full view. How many time small is the earth from that perpsective?
To visualize the scale you’re asking about, we need to consider the observable universe, which is estimated to have a diameter of about 93 billion light-years. Let’s compare this to the diameter of the Earth, which is approximately 12,742 kilometers.

First, let’s convert the diameter of the observable universe from light-years to kilometers. Since light travels at about 299,792 kilometers per second, and there are about 31,556,952 seconds in a year:

93 billion light-years * 9.461 × 10^12 kilometers/light-year ≈ 8.8 × 10^23 kilometers

Now we can compare the diameter of the observable universe to the diameter of the Earth:

8.8 × 10^23 km (observable universe) / 12,742 km (Earth) ≈ 6.9 × 10^19 times

So, when zoomed out to see the entire observable universe, the Earth would appear incredibly tiny, about 69 quintillion times smaller than what you’re observing.
From our perspective, what is ~69 quintillion times smaller?
To put the scale of approximately 69 quintillion times smaller into perspective, consider the following analogy:

Imagine you have a grain of sand. Now, multiply the size of that grain of sand by 69 quintillion. The result would be so infinitesimally small that it would be difficult to grasp its scale. It would be like trying to compare the size of that grain of sand to the entire Earth itself.

In simpler terms, it’s akin to comparing a single atom to the size of a mountain range, or comparing a drop of water to the volume of all the oceans combined. The difference is truly staggering and highlights the vastness of the observable universe compared to the relatively tiny scale of the Earth.
No, what can a man see if he were to see down 89 quitillion times smaller
If a man were to see down approximately 69 quintillion times smaller, it would be like trying to observe something incredibly minuscule compared to what we can see with the naked eye. Here are some examples to illustrate this scale:

1. Comparing it to the thickness of a human hair: Imagine dividing the thickness of a single human hair into 69 quintillion parts. What you would end up with is a scale so small that it would be nearly impossible to discern with the naked eye.

2. Considering the size of a single cell: Cells are the basic building blocks of life, and they are already incredibly small to the naked eye. If you were to shrink down 69 quintillion times smaller, you would be looking at structures within a cell at a scale far beyond our current capabilities to observe.

3. Visualizing the scale of an atom: Atoms are the fundamental units of matter, and they are already far too small to see with the naked eye. Shrinking down by 69 quintillion times would take you into the realm of subatomic particles, such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, which are orders of magnitude smaller than atoms.

In summary, seeing down 69 quintillion times smaller would take you into a realm of scale that is beyond our current understanding and technological capabilities, where even the smallest structures of our known world become incomprehensibly tiny.
Could he see an electron? or would that electron even be too big?
Seeing an electron with the naked eye, or even with current technology, is not feasible due to the incredibly small scale of electrons.

Electrons are subatomic particles with a size much smaller than the wavelength of visible light, which means they cannot be observed using optical microscopes. In fact, the size of an electron is on the order of magnitude of femtometers (10^-15 meters), while visible light has wavelengths on the order of hundreds of nanometers (10^-9 meters), making electrons billions of times smaller than the wavelength of visible light.

Current technology, such as electron microscopes, can indirectly observe the behavior and properties of electrons by utilizing their interactions with other particles or fields. However, directly “seeing” an electron as we would see larger objects with our eyes is not possible due to the limitations of both the size of the electron and the wavelengths of visible light.

So, even if one could hypothetically see down 69 quintillion times smaller, observing individual electrons would still be beyond the realm of possibility due to their minuscule size.
If I were able to magnify something 69 quintillion times what could I see?
If you were able to magnify something by 69 quintillion times, it would dramatically enhance your ability to observe incredibly small details. At this level of magnification, you would be delving into the realm of subatomic particles and structures within atoms. Here are some examples of what you might be able to see at such an extreme level of magnification:

1. **Subatomic particles**: You would be able to see individual subatomic particles such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, which are the building blocks of atoms.

2. **Atomic structure**: With such a high level of magnification, you could observe the structure of individual atoms, including the arrangement of electrons in orbit around the nucleus.

3. **Molecular structure**: Beyond atomic scale, you would be able to see the arrangement of atoms within molecules, allowing you to study molecular structures in great detail.

4. **Chemical bonds**: At this scale, you could observe the formation and breaking of chemical bonds between atoms, providing insights into chemical reactions and processes.

5. **Biological structures**: You could observe the intricate details of biological structures such as DNA molecules, proteins, and cellular organelles, allowing for a deeper understanding of cellular processes and functions.

6. **Material properties**: By observing materials at such a small scale, you could gain insights into their physical and chemical properties, including their conductivity, strength, and other characteristics.

Overall, magnifying something by 69 quintillion times would unlock a world of incredibly small details, providing invaluable insights into the fundamental building blocks of matter and the intricacies of the natural world at the atomic and molecular levels.
So the eartrh could really be an “electron” in orbit around a nucleus in a machine so grand we cannot even concieve its scale
The analogy you’ve drawn is an intriguing way to conceptualize the scale of the universe and the possibility of higher-dimensional structures or entities beyond our current understanding. In this analogy, the Earth could be likened to an electron orbiting around a nucleus within a vastly grander and incomprehensible system or machine.

While it’s important to note that this analogy is speculative and metaphorical, it does highlight the idea that our perception of scale and reality may be limited by our current understanding and technological capabilities. Just as an electron exists within the framework of atoms, which in turn make up molecules, which then form larger structures, it’s conceivable that our universe could be just one component within a larger, more complex system that we are unable to perceive or comprehend fully.

This idea resonates with certain concepts in theoretical physics, such as string theory and the multiverse hypothesis, which suggest the existence of higher-dimensional structures and parallel universes beyond our observable universe. While these ideas remain speculative and largely theoretical, they inspire curiosity and drive scientific inquiry into the nature of reality and our place within it.
That is the scale relative to the size of the universe, we are no more the size of an atom if viewed from that side
Indeed, when considering the scale of the entire universe, the Earth and even our entire galaxy are mere specks compared to its vastness. In the grand scheme of the universe, the size of our planet is incredibly insignificant. Just as an atom is minuscule compared to the Earth, the Earth is similarly minuscule compared to the vastness of the cosmos.

From the perspective of the entire universe, the scale of the Earth, our solar system, and even our entire galaxy is so small that it’s difficult to fathom. It’s akin to viewing an atom from our human perspective. This comparison underscores the immense size and complexity of the universe relative to our own existence.

So, in the context of the entire universe, we indeed occupy a scale that is akin to that of subatomic particles when compared to the Earth and the cosmos as a whole.
Indeed, when considering the vast scale of the universe, the Earth and even our entire galaxy are minuscule in comparison. If we were to imagine an entity or structure of incomprehensible scale, akin to the grand machine you mentioned, our entire galaxy, including the Earth, could indeed be perceived as tiny as subatomic particles in relation to its overall size.

In this perspective, the scale of the universe dwarfs not only the size of individual celestial bodies like planets and stars but also entire galaxies. Our understanding of scale is stretched to its limits when contemplating the enormity of the cosmos.

This realization underscores the humbling nature of astronomy and cosmology, prompting us to ponder our place in the universe and the vastness of the unknown beyond our own cosmic neighborhood. It’s a reminder of the boundless mysteries waiting to be explored and the limitations of our current understanding.