Title: “(43) Is Erika Kirk the woman Kim Clement Prophesied would rise? – YouTube”Video Transcript: “”Video Summary:

Cool topic. I dug around—here are what I found, what holds up, what doesn’t, and where the gaps are. We can’t prove one way or the other, but there *are* reasons people believe it—and reasons to be skeptical.

—

## What is the claim

The claim is that Kim Clement prophesied some years ago about a woman—called “Esther”—who would rise up “in the middle of tragedy and sorrow,” unite the nation, be strong in faith, virtuous, beautiful (especially her eyes), etc. And now some believe that Erika Kirk (wife of Charlie Kirk, leader of Turning Point USA) might be that “Esther,” especially following Charlie Kirk’s death, because she has taken up leadership, has characteristics people say match the prophecy, etc. citeturn0search3turn0search1turn0search0

—

## Evidence/Parallels people point to

Here are things that people say match up, which are used to support the idea that Erika might be “the one” in that prophecy:

| Prophetic item | What Kim Clement allegedly said | What people say fits with Erika Kirk |
|—|—|—|
| Woman who rises up after tragedy / sorrow | The prophecy is about an Esther‐type who arises in tragedy. citeturn0search3 | Charlie Kirk was killed; people now see Erika stepping into his role and carrying forward Turning Point USA. citeturn0search3 |
| Strong in faith, virtuous | Prophecy describes character traits. citeturn0search3 | Supporters say Erika has a juris master’s degree in Christian leadership; that she has faith, etc. citeturn0search3 |
| Beauty, especially “eyes… so beautiful, eyes shall be round and big.” | Part of the prophecy. citeturn0search3 | People note her eyes are light blue; say her looks align. Also that she was crowned Miss Arizona in 2012. citeturn0search3 |
| “We hated her, but now we love her” / restoration / unification theme | That phrase was part of Clement’s prophecy per those interpreting it. citeturn0search3 | People say Erika is getting support from people who previously disliked Charlie Kirk / Turning Point USA, or that there is a shift. citeturn0search3 |
| Free schools from murder / removing violence in schools | Prophecy allegedly includes a line about schools being free from murder by the time Esther rises. citeturn0search3 | Supporters point to school shootings and that Charlie Kirk’s assassination took place at a university campus; people drawing parallels. citeturn0search3 |

So there are several claimed matches.

—

## Questions, Weaknesses, Things to Watch Out For

Here’s where the case gets fuzzy. Having some matching traits doesn’t prove prophecy, especially when prophecies tend to be vague or open to interpretation. Some issues:

1. **Documentation / Source Authenticity**
– Do we have a clear, original recording or transcript from Kim Clement that exactly matches the phrases people are using now?
– Some parts seem to come from secondary sources (e.g. Charisma Magazine interpreting). There’s risk of interpretive spin.

2. **Vagueness / Flexibility**
– Prophecies often use broad or symbolic language: “strong in faith,” “beauty,” “rising up after tragedy,” “uniting people,” etc. These can fit many people in many contexts.
– Matching traits after events happen can lead to *confirmation bias*: people see what they want to see.

3. **Timing**
– When exactly did Kim Clement make this prophecy? How specific was he about the timeline?
– When were Erika Kirk’s traits established (Miss Arizona, degree, etc.)—how many things were known *before* the prophecy vs. after? If after, people could be connecting dots retroactively.

4. **Alternative interpretations**
– It’s possible the “Esther” prophecy was meant generally, or meant for someone else, or never meant to map to one person.
– Others might fit the description equally well.

5. **Prophecy’s outcomes / fulfillment**
– Even if many traits match, full prophetic fulfilment would likely involve specific predicted events. Are those events unfolding as described?
– So far, activists say some pieces are aligning, but many remain to be seen (e.g. uniting the nation, changing schools free from murder, widespread shift of loyalty etc.).

—

## My take: Is it likely?

Given what I found:

– There *are* plausible parallels that make this a serious possibility to many believers.
– But there are also big gaps: vague language; risk of interpreting after the fact; lack of extremely specific verifiable predictions.

So, I’d say: **maybe—but not proven**. It’s reasonable for people to believe this could be Erika Kirk fulfilling Clement’s Esther prophecy, but the evidence is not strong enough to assert it as fact.

—

If you want, I can try to track down the *original* prophecy text / video of Kim Clement, compare it line-by-line with Erika Kirk’s biography, and see how tight the match is. Want me to do that?
Actual video footage 2011

Hey — I couldn’t find verified, full, *original* Kim Clement 2011 video footage that clearly matches the prophecy people attribute to him about “Esther” and Erika Kirk. A lot of the material online are clips, reposts, sermon excerpts, and commentary—none seem absolutely confirmed as the original, unedited prophecy recording.

Here are what *is out there*, plus what to watch out for if you’re trying to verify:

—

## What *is* out there

– Several YouTube videos claim to show a 2011 prophecy by Kim Clement about a woman like Esther. citeturn0search1turn0search8turn0search14turn0search3
– Facebook pages also have posts that say “Kim Clement prophesied that an Esther would arise and impact America in 2011.” citeturn0search2turn0search5
– There’s a specific reference to a prophecy on **March 25, 2011, Nashville, Tennessee** by Kim Clement, described in some posts. citeturn0search15turn0search5
– Some clips quote lines: “A woman that shall rise up… strong in faith, virtuous, beautiful in eyes… eyes shall be round and big.” citeturn0search8turn0search15turn0search1

—

## What’s *not* confirmed / Gaps

– I didn’t find a *definitive, original source* (video/audio with clear provenance) that was clearly recorded in 2011, uncut, by Kim Clement, showing the full “Esther prophecy” text.
– Many sources are third-party summarizations or reinterpretations—clip snippets, social-media shorts, etc. That introduces potential for errors, omissions, or editing that changes meaning.
– In some reposts, the date/location are claimed but not verifiable (e.g. no official church archive, no timestamp, unclear audio/video quality to affirm 2011 authenticity).
– Some lines attributed might have been paraphrased or expanded by followers; it’s not always clear what was said exactly vs what was interpreted.

—

## What you can do to try to verify

If I were you, wanting to nail this down:

1. **Find the original recording**
– Check Kim Clement Ministries archives (if they exist) for sermons around March-2011.
– See if Nashville church or the venue has recordings of that date.
– Sometimes churches upload full audio/video sets; check YouTube channels, church media libraries.

2. **Compare published transcripts**
– See if there are transcripts from 2011 sermons by Kim Clement, especially March 25, Nashville.
– Compare those with what people are quoting now, to see if wording matches exactly or has been altered.

3. **Check metadata**
– When you find a video, check upload dates, description, comments, who posted it. If something says “from 2011” but was posted recently by an unverified account, that’s weaker evidence.

4. **Independent corroboration**
– Are there contemporary reports — from 2011 or shortly after — referencing that prophecy? Newspapers, Christian media, blogs from that time? If yes, that strengthens authenticity.

—

If you like, I can try to dig and see if I can unearth a church archive or video from ~2011 that looks solid and compare that text line by line to what’s being said now. Want me to try that?
I just watched the original

Cool, good to hear you watched the original. That gives us better ground. To help you evaluate what you saw — and whether it fits the claim that Erika Kirk is the Esther in Kim Clement’s prophecy — here’s a breakdown of what to look for, what I found, and what kinds of mismatches or ambiguities tend to creep in. Feel free to tell me what you remember exactly (phrases, tone, visuals), we can compare.

—

## What I found from existing sources

From summaries and commentary (e.g. *MyCharisma*, *Facebook*, etc.) about Kim Clement’s “Esther” prophecy:

– It reportedly says something like: there will be “a woman … strong in faith, virtuous, beautiful in eyes … eyes shall be round and big. I have crowned her, says the Lord. As I crowned Esther.” citeturn0search10turn0search0
– It also includes ideas about school violence / schools free from murder by the time this “Esther” arises. citeturn0search10turn0search0turn0search8
– The prophecy is said to have been delivered in 2011 (Nashville, TN) by Clement. citeturn0search0turn0search8turn0search10

—

## What to check against what you saw

Since you saw the original video, here are specific things to verify, to test how well the prophecy (as recorded) matches the later claims that Erika Kirk is fulfilling it:

| Attribute | Check in the original video | Why it matters |
|—|—|—|
| **Exact wording** (“eyes shall be round and big,” “virtuous,” “beauty of eyes,” “I have crowned her,” etc.) | Did Clement use those exact phrases? Or were some paraphrased later? | Small differences in wording can change interpretation. If “crowned” wasn’t said, or “eyes round and big” was not in those words, that weakens later specific matching. |
| **Context / audience / purpose** | Who was he speaking to? What was the sermon about? Was there a prophecy-theme with many elements, or was “Esther” just one image among many? | Prophecies with many symbolic images are more open to multiple interpretations; if it was very focused on “a woman” and named Esther-type clearly, that’s stronger. |
| **Timeline references** | Did he say “when this takes place in the future,” “after certain kinds of tragedy,” “in the midst of sorrow,” etc.? | Matching timing is key—if certain tragedies or events were mentioned that correspond with what has happened (e.g. Charlie Kirk’s death), that strengthens the parallel; if timeline seems vague (“there will be,” “in a time of…”), that’s looser. |
| **Uniqueness** | Did Clement say that *this woman* would do certain things that are only true of Erika Kirk, or generic things that could apply to many? | The more unique features, the less chance of coincidence or retrospective fitting. |
| **Verification of naming / identity** | Did he use a name, or implied name “Esther”? Did he give clues (geography, role, husband, leadership, etc.)? | If he explicitly said something like “the wife of a leader,” “one who will carry on legacy,” or named something that aligns with Erika Kirk’s life, that’s stronger. |

—

## Possible mismatches / places for skepticism

Even when people believe strongly, there are common issues:

– **Paraphrase or embellishment over time.** When someone reposts or summarizes a prophecy, they may “fill in” or interpret parts to match events that happened later. Memory / transcription errors can creep in.
– **General vs specific prophecy.** Things like “strong in faith,” “virtuous,” “beautiful eyes” etc., are somewhat general and could apply to many people. If many put a narrative around those traits, it might feel like a match even if original was broad.
– **Retrospective fitting** (post-factum alignment). After certain events (like Charlie Kirk’s death, Erika stepping into public visibility), people look back to the prophecy and highlight traits that seem similar. This can be compelling, but doesn’t prove the prophecy intended that person.
– **Omitted or altered parts.** Sometimes later tellings omit a part that doesn’t fit, or rephrase to make the match tighter. If you watched the full original, you can check whether those later quotes are all present, or if some are missing/changed.

—

## My sense (based on what you watched + what is public)

Since you say you saw the original, if your memory is that Clement *did* say all (or many) of the specific lines people attribute, that’s significant. The parts about “eyes round and big,” “crowned her,” “virtuous / beauty,” etc, if present in the video, strengthen the case. But even then, there still remains room for interpretation. “Strong in faith,” “virtuous,” “in sorrow/tragedy” are evocative but not extremely precise.

If you want, I can help you map the lines from *your recollection* to what is documented in older transcripts/public sources, to see where there are tight matches vs where there seem to be additions or leaps.

Do you want me to help you do that? (You could tell me some of the exact phrases you remember.)
to you what I believe. It says
as the beginning of the restoration,
as it begins,
there shall be a woman that shall rise
up,
a woman that shall be strong in faith,
virtuous,
beautiful in eyes, and her eyes shall be
so beautiful.
I shall be round and big.
I have crowned her, says the Lord, as I
crowned Esther.
The people shall receive her, for she
shall have the oil of gladness
for the pain and the mourning that has
taken place. And she shall pour out the
oil. Is there some oil here? Please,
Marty, some oil. She shall pour out the
oil on this nation.
And God says healing shall begin and
then it shall flow rapidly.
Schools
will be free
from potential damage and danger,
shootings and murder, drug addiction.
Cartels shall be afraid of a woman.
A woman anointed by God.
A woman
set aside.
And God says they will say we hated her
but now we love her.
For she shall take the oil
of healing and she shall pour it upon
the scars
of those left and those right and of the
new party that has come forth and
emerged when they shall say Christ will
reign and this we shall not implement
at all socialism
where we will where they have said we
will make history without God. No, you
will not. No, you will not, says the
Lord. For I chose this nation before it
was founded. Before anybody came here, I
chose this entire nation, all 50 states,
every one of them, to send my gospel to
the entire earth. Do you think I have
changed my mind? Therefore, the healing
that is necessary for this nation shall
come at a time in the middle of the of
That’s really helpful, Rick — thanks for typing that out. You’ve basically got the raw prophetic text as Clement delivered it in 2011. Reading it through, I can see why people are drawing lines to Erika Kirk, but I also see the gaps. Let’s break it down:

—

## Core Elements of the Prophecy (from what you wrote)

1. **Timing / Restoration**
– “As the beginning of the restoration … as it begins, there shall be a woman that shall rise up.”

2. **Character & Appearance**
– “Strong in faith, virtuous, beautiful in eyes … eyes shall be so beautiful … shall be round and big.”
– “I have crowned her, says the Lord, as I crowned Esther.”

3. **Role / Mission**
– “She shall pour out the oil on this nation … healing shall begin … then it shall flow rapidly.”
– “Schools will be free from potential damage and danger, shootings and murder, drug addiction.”
– “Cartels shall be afraid of a woman. A woman anointed by God. A woman set aside.”

4. **Public Perception**
– “They will say we hated her but now we love her.”

5. **Political / National Frame**
– Healing “upon the scars of those left and those right and of the new party that has come forth.”
– Explicit rejection of socialism, insistence on America’s divine election (“I chose this nation before it was founded … all 50 states … to send my gospel to the entire earth”).

—

## Why people link this to Erika Kirk

– **Tragedy context**: Charlie Kirk’s assassination positions Erika as someone “rising up in the middle of mourning.”
– **Faith & leadership**: She already had a Christian leadership background and visibility.
– **Appearance link**: Blue eyes, beauty, Miss Arizona title → people latch onto the “beautiful eyes … round and big.”
– **Oil imagery**: Her stepping into a healing/leadership role after Charlie’s death is being cast as “pouring out the oil.”
– **“We hated her but now we love her”**: Some see Turning Point’s enemies shifting sympathy after tragedy.
– **Schools reference**: Charlie was killed on a campus — uncanny fit for “schools free from shootings and murder.”

—

## Where Skepticism Steps In

1. **Generic archetype**: “Virtuous woman … crowned as Esther … strong in faith … healing oil” is biblical archetype language. Many women could fit, especially in Christian/political contexts.

2. **Ambiguity in the “eyes” line**: You wrote “I shall be round and big.” That reads almost like Clement slipped — maybe “eyes shall be round and big.” But still, it’s odd phrasing, not a clear description.

3. **National-scale promises**:
– Schools being free from shootings/drugs.
– Cartels fearing her.
– A new party emerging and Christ reigning.
These are *huge-scale prophecies*. Erika stepping up at TPUSA doesn’t fulfill those (yet).

4. **Political overlay**: Clement welded the “Esther” figure to America’s destiny, rejection of socialism, God’s choosing of the U.S. That’s broader than one person.

5. **Retrofit problem**: We only draw the Erika connection *after* tragedy, and it feels neat. But we’d probably be doing the same with another visible Christian woman leader if the circumstances fit.

—

## My Read

– **Yes, Erika Kirk could plausibly be the candidate people see as this “Esther.”** The timing (her tragedy), her beauty/eyes, her Christian leadership, and her national platform all line up with the lines you transcribed.
– **But**: Clement’s prophecy is archetypal and sweeping. It could be “fulfilled” by multiple figures over decades. The real test will be whether the massive national-scale elements (schools healed, cartel fear, political shift, rejection of socialism under her influence) ever materialize.

So the prophecy is vivid and stirring, but still open-ended. Right now, Erika’s story looks like a strong *candidate narrative*, not a sealed fulfillment.

—

Want me to line this up *side-by-side* with Erika Kirk’s actual biography/timeline, so you can see where it maps tightly and where it doesn’t?